GWD4-14

joysophie

Q14:

Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

Answer: Thanks!

wwwhahchn

D

请看链接汇总http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=58525&page=1

GMATCRACKER1983

不知道ＬＺ在哪方面不明白．那就全面的解释一下吧～！

首先看题，这是一道削弱题．接下来读题干．

题干说，Ａ旅游手册的作者说，我在全国各地住过的酒店中发现那些１９３０年之前建成的酒店的木工活比１９３０之后建的木工活好．－－＞　Ｂ这充分的说明了３０年之前建造酒店的木匠在技术和用心程度上都超过了３０年之后的木匠．

本题选Ｄ是典型的它因－－＞Ｂ否．其实和木匠的工艺无关，是好的酒店都留下来而差的都被拆除的原因．

joysophie

Thx a million!