GWD-TN-6一道逻辑题

stellapan95

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Concerned about financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65.  Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.  Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because ________.

A.      They rely entirely on the government pension for their income

B.       Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check

C.       They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation

D.      The pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high

E.       In Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living


看解释都说A无关直接排除。
我想问为什么不能这样理解：本来老人是有自己的收入来源的，但现在政府给补贴了，老人就不工作了，全部依靠政府的补贴。所以总体来说老人的经济状况没有改变。
这不是跟E的解释一个道理吗？为什么不行呢？

alzn2765

本来老人是有自己的收入来源的，但现在政府给补贴了，老人就不工作了，全部依靠政府的补贴

红色字的内容题干里哪里说了？如果是你自己额外假设的，你应该知道自己错在哪里了吧？

stellapan95

alzn2765 发表于 2016-4-10 15:48
本来老人是有自己的收入来源的，但现在政府给补贴了，老人就不工作了，全部依靠政府的补贴

红色字的内容题 ...

懂了，谢谢！