ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1125|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] CXD Assumption 第7题 Three percent is an insignificant portion

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-4-5 05:29:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Last year,suppor for the social and behavioral sciences represented only about three percent of the govenment's total budget for research fund in the United States.Thus,the particularly sharp reductions imposed on such programs this year seem dictated not by financial constraints but by social philosophy.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the conclusion of the passage above is based?
(A) The government funds allocated for research in the social and behavioral sciences are not sufficient for the work that needs to be done.
(B) The social and behavioral sciences are as valuable as the physical and biological sciences.
(C) The current reductions will stop research in the social and behavioral sciences.
(D) Government funding is the primary source of research money in the United States.
(E) Three percent is an insignificant portion of the government's total budget for research funds.


搜了一下之前没有人问过,故发帖。。。
请问这道题因果之间的关系?
Prem: only three percent
Conclusion: down in number is not by financial constriants
Assumption: three percent is not significant.


表示不太能理解这个逻辑链,求NN解惑。。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-5 06:11:51 | 只看该作者
顶顶~~~
板凳
发表于 2016-4-5 07:26:39 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-5 19:52:57 | 只看该作者
elusive 发表于 2016-4-5 07:26
因果
因:项目只占了政府预算的百分之3
(assumption:但是这百分之3对于这个项目是很少的)

有点明白了... 如果原文写成:such programs this year seem dictated not by government financial constraints but by social philosophy. 可能理解的更容易些 --是引入了第三方即社会投资。。。

谢谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 09:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部