ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zhangmengchen
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] 每天一道CR题,欢迎大家来讨论

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-29 11:08:54 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2016-3-29 10:21
多谢前人挖坑,我现在不答疑了。

不是答疑啊亲,题都是有疑惑性的,但是不是贴上来让大家解答,而是让大家讨论的!
12#
发表于 2016-3-29 11:17:50 | 只看该作者
zhangmengchen 发表于 2016-3-29 11:08
不是答疑啊亲,题都是有疑惑性的,但是不是贴上来让大家解答,而是让大家讨论的! ...

有人讨论错了我会指出。
这题不太难,没啥可讨论的。
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-11 12:57:18 | 只看该作者
Fact: Asthma, a bronchial condition, is much less common ailment than hay fever, an allergic inflammation of the nasal passages.Fact: Over 95 percent of people who have asthma also suffer from hay fever.

If the information given as facts above is true, which of the following must also be true?

A Hay fever is a prerequisite for the development of asthma.  

B Asthma is a prerequisite for the development of hay fever.  

C Those who have neither hay fever nor asthma comprise less than 5 percent of the total population.  

D The number of people who have both of these ailments is greater than the number of people who have only one of them.  

E The percentage of people suffering from hay fever who also have asthma is lower than 95 percent.  
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-11 13:01:13 | 只看该作者
这题容易一眼选中B选项,而B选项不对的原因也正是GMAC的严谨!
积累就是进步!
15#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-11 13:45:01 | 只看该作者
Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

A Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.  

B It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.  

C The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

D As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.  

E In the snow goose's winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-11 13:51:44 | 只看该作者
这题刚开始看,一直不知道在说啥,但是你会发现5个选项都似乎跟答案不沾边,所以可以判断这是一道难题,难题一般都有不同于普通题的思路。
普通题可能会说snow geese 和别的鸟类有什么关系,导致他们的减少也会影响到别的鸟类数量!
所以这类题绝对不在这种方向,而在于题设中明确点名的词---restriction!
我们会考虑万一取消了restriction以后也没有什么效果或者万一取消了以后有反效果呢?
可是依旧没有相关答案。
此时应该再关注时间和空间轴所带来的提示---recent increase!
那我们要看这个increase是不是因为recent restriction带来的呢?结果发现B说到several years!!
BANG,答案出来了!也就是restriction进行了这么多年都没啥事,为啥现在就要取消呢?证明这次带来的威胁并不是由于所谓的restriction导致的,从而weaken了!

很好的一道题!积累就是进步!!!
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-12 14:52:53 | 只看该作者
一道蛮难的BF题!

Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer's legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangements, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees.

In the consumer advocate's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization.  

B The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.  

C The first is pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.  

D The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.  

E The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate defends; the second is that position.
18#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-12 15:16:03 | 只看该作者
这个题,刚开始在读的时候一直以为consumer advocate后只有第一句话是consumer的观点,没想到其实后面整一段都是他的观点,所以可以看出他的态度是,先说了一个普遍的观点,然后推翻它,所以打心里,他是不认可however前面的,因此选择了C。所以有时候做题,并不是你不会,而是你不懂套路。
积累就是进步!
19#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-12 21:17:44 | 只看该作者
再一道BOLD FACE

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.  

B The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by that evidence.  

C The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.  

D The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.  

E The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
20#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-14 18:12:28 | 只看该作者
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

A those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training  

B even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations  

C many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations  

D after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth  

E even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 21:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部