ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1508|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全80竟然全错,有人象这样么

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-8 01:18:00 | 只看该作者

大全80竟然全错,有人象这样么

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors (board of directors: 董事会) and dictate company policy. Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out (sell out: v.卖完, 出卖, 背叛) for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies. Today, with few exceptions, the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions—pension funds, for example—and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company’s stock and from actively influencing a company’s decision-making, they can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations in its value. A minority shareholder is necessarily a short term trader. As a result, United States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits.


Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors. The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions (省略了SHOULD BE) encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest. In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity. Such measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest.


1.     In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with doing which of the following?


(A) Comparing two different approaches to a problem


(B) Describing a problem and proposing a solution  E==B


(C) Defending an established method


(D) Presenting data and drawing conclusions from the dataB


(E) Comparing two different analyses of a current situation


2.     It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is true of majority shareholders in a corporation?


(A) They make the corporation’s operational management decisions.


(B) They are not allowed to own more than fifty percent of the corporation’s stock. C==D


(C) They cannot make quick profits by selling their stock in the corporation.


(D) They are more interested in profits than in productivity.D


(E) They cannot sell any of their stock in the corporation without giving the public advance notice.


3.     According to the passage, the purpose of the requirement suggested in lines 30-33 would be which of the following?


(A) To encourage institutional stockholders to sell stock that they believe will decrease in value


(B) To discourage institutional stockholders from intervening in the operation of a company whose stock they own


(C) To discourage short-term profit-taking by institutional stockholders


(D) To encourage a company’s employees to take an active role in the ownership of stock in the companyC


(E) To encourage investors to diversify their stock holdings  E==C


4.     Which of the following best explains the author’s statement that “A minority shareholder is necessarily a short-term trader” (lines 15-16)?


(A) The only way a minority shareholder can make money from stocks is to buy and sell stocks as prices fluctuate over short periods of time.


(B) Only a shareholder who owns a majority of a company’s stock can influence the trading price of the stock over a long period of time.


(C) A minority shareholder is prohibited by law from buying stock and holding it for long-term profits.   C==A


(D) Large institutions like pension funds cannot legally own a majority of any corporation’s stock.A


(E) A minority shareholder rarely takes an interest in the decisions of a corporation’s board of directors.


5.     The author suggests that which of the following is a true statement about people who typify the “old style capitalist” referred to in line 23?


(A) They now rely on outdated management techniques.


(B) They seldom engaged in short-term trading of the stock they owned.


(C) They did not influence the investment policies of the corporations in which they invested.


(D) They now play a much smaller role in the stock market as a result of antitrust legislation.B


(E) They were primarily concerned with maximizing the short-term profitability of the corporations in which they owned stock.  E==B


文章虽然短,自以为做得不错,对答案后竟然全错|!!!!!明天再分析了。



想问问斑竹和各位XDJM,大家做大全的步骤是怎样的?先看文章再做题目?看文章要多长时间,偶要花5-10分钟,很慢,做完一篇,18-20分钟就这样过去,很慢是吗?而且正确绿不高,8-9道,少则错3个,多则错5-6个,这篇全错。是不是偶的方法有问题,做了20来篇了,平均还是错4-5道左右。困惑中。。。。

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-8 13:19:00 | 只看该作者

分析后,发现1和5题有疑问,其他错是因为没找到文中的信息,也没看懂深层意思/


第一题,答案B Describing a problem and proposing a solution  是有描述企业买卖股票的问题,但是怎么是有提出一个solution呢?哪里说了呀?


第五题,从第二段第一句看:Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors,说明old-style capitalist 目前的是与today’s short-term traders 不同的做法的,而today’s short-term traders 现在要往企业的长期投资做,所以old-style capitalist 不能是关注长期的了,应该是短期,所以选项B They seldom engaged in short-term trading of the stock they owned,是有矛盾的呀,为什么呢?拿位说说

板凳
发表于 2005-8-9 08:38:00 | 只看该作者

第一题——在文章的第二段有solutions:


(1)The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions (省略了SHOULD BE) encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest.


(2)In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company’s stock should be forced to give the public one day’s notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’ productivity.


第二题:


由于在第一段比较了两种资本家的区别——"old style"注重长期生产率的提高,而现在的traders注重短期投资收益。第二段:"Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely"意思是说“不可能回到以前的资本家形式”(由于社会立法、经济环境的改变等),所以“today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors”,即通过其他的方法使短期投资者成为将来的长期投资者。因此,并没有和第一段内容矛盾!


个人意见,仅供参考。


地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-9 08:58:00 | 只看该作者

哦,原来文章一直都有说...should be。。。这样,这些说来也算是提出解决方案了


第五,第一段说了旧资本家特点?是这句说明了么:Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out (sell out: v.卖完, 出卖, 背叛) for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies?


我做的时候只是从这句入手:Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today’s short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow’s long-term capitalistic investors,根据这里,可以知道today的跟old-style的不一样,又说不能回到old-style capitalist,但是today的已经开始往长期投资走,如果old-style注重长期生产率的提高,这样today的不就是回到了old-style capitalist,所以矛盾。因此,我认为old-style capitalist不可能是注重长期生产率的提高,应该是短期。


还是对第五题有点迷惑不解。。。。


谢谢这位兄弟

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-5 13:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部