ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lululuna
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【悦读】拾忆月1125始阅读机经 (12月24日 已换库)

[精华]   [复制链接]
1101#
发表于 2015-12-4 16:26:15 | 只看该作者
阅读君,18和21我感觉应该是同一篇,可以确认一下~
1102#
发表于 2015-12-5 12:47:18 | 只看该作者
感谢整理君!能否考古36篇红移现象呢?
1103#
发表于 2015-12-5 21:35:27 | 只看该作者
祝楼主托福高分分手~~~请问有没有本月的阅读精简版呢
1104#
发表于 2015-12-6 00:10:55 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
1105#
发表于 2015-12-6 03:04:19 | 只看该作者
所以楼主你托福考得如何.....
1106#
发表于 2015-12-6 04:24:43 | 只看该作者
谢谢!!!!楼主辛苦!
1107#
发表于 2015-12-6 04:58:05 | 只看该作者
好人一身平安 感谢楼主
1108#
发表于 2015-12-6 11:38:16 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
1109#
发表于 2015-12-6 11:38:54 | 只看该作者
25. Bundle Marketing

Aggregation Bundling
This concept involves producing a bundle that will appeal to a number of customer segments. Suppose you have four items: A, B, C, and D. One segment strongly prefers the first three, and a second segment strongly prefers the last three. It may be possible to combine all four items into one bundle and price it so that both segments will purchase it, albeit for different reasons. That is, by bundling, you are combining segments of the market with different tastes and preferences into an aggregate segment with a similar valuation for the bundle. The goal is to attract a large market and reduce complexity by having fewer products. The secret is in pricing the bundle so that your comprehensive offering is more attractive than specialized bundles offered by competitors. A corollary of the basic strategy is to produce, in addition, special bundles (or individual items) for smaller market segments at higher prices.
Credit card firms use this strategy. The typical credit card includes a wide variety of services. It is unlikely that a large segment of subscribers actually are interested in all of these services. Customers who travel frequently may value car rental insurance or access to traveler's checks in foreign countries. Others may value a purchase protection plan. They all buy the same card.
This apparently has been a winning strategy for credit card companies. American Express introduced it in 1966 for the gold card, and Visa and MasterCard followed closely. American Express continues to aggregate differing customer segments by wooing college students and increasing the number and types of locations that accept its cards. Currently places like Shoney's family restaurants and Cineplex movie theaters accept American Express.4 How this expansion will affect its standing in the prestige segment of the market remains to be seen. In an effort to cater to this segment, American Express offers the platinum card for $300 per year.
Restaurants are also heavy users of aggregation bundling. Standard dinner packages include soup, salad, and entree. Restaurateurs hope that most of their clientele will order the dinner package. However, to satisfy both large and small appetites, the á la carte menu offers individual items at premium prices. This mixed approach to bundling is especially valuable for restaurants. Because of the social nature of their service, the same menu must accommodate all members of a party.
The rapid changes in the health maintenance organization (HMO) industry show that customer pressures can frustrate attempts to maintain a single aggregate market bundle, and that companies sometimes can unbundle. Historically, HMOs have been a prime example of a pure bundle; all of an individual's health care needs are met at one fixed price. But customers are demanding alternate bundles. Employers feel they must offer something for all of their employees. Non-local sales staff, long distance commuters, and employees with unusual medical needs are hard pressed to use the standard HMO plan. Preferred provider organizations (PPOs) have little difficulty in handling these individual needs. Thus, to meet the PPO competition and to retain employer contracts, HMOs must customize reduced or altered health care plans. These are usually priced at a substantial premium.
Loyalty Bundling
Here the basic idea is to expand sales by reducing customer incentives to sample and perhaps switch to a competitor's product. CitiCorp has used its CitiOne financial account successfully to this effect. Customers who purchase this account receive a reduced price on a bundle of services. For example, a minimum balance in a money market account gives the customer check writing privileges at no charge. CitiCorp also wins. First, it gains operating efficiencies. It costs about the same amount to open one or several accounts for a customer at the same time. A bundled account opens several accounts simultaneously. Second, Citicorp's research shows that customers who purchase two or more products from the same institution are unusually loyal. Once the accounts are open, the transaction cost to the customer is very low. A person is more apt to move funds from the checking account to the money market fund during a cash transaction than to initiate a new transaction with a competing bank. Thus for no increase in its operating cost, CitiCorp obtains a sales advantage.
Consumer goods firms also package products in order to build manufacturer loyalty, or at least to encourage switching only among their own offerings. Cereal manufacturers offer different "variety packs" geared to adults and children. Each pack has between six and twelve different brands of cereals. Firms satisfy consumer desire for variety while retaining their customers under the broad umbrella of one manufacturer.
1110#
发表于 2015-12-6 13:09:31 | 只看该作者
找到一些像是 美国的债务关系 的考古。 请确认。

以下来自去年圣诞月机经。
29.        美国从债权人变债务人【考古确认】
V1 By ryanming  V28
还有一道对于美国在全球从债权人变成债务人转变的两种不同观点的探讨。

V2 by    253441309  V 40
补充题目主旨题:我选择的是exam two positions concerning a phenomenon
还有一个题目好长的,最后也没看懂,说什么image的。。我选的是直接投资和证券组合的difference
别的题目应该看完鸡精都没问题

V3 by    lz721  v31
问题考古一里面很全,问为什么提到portfolio和direct投资的目的,我和那个狗主一样选的也是为了反驳另一个观点。还有一个问了这两种观点的差异在哪里,我选的也是他们就怎么看待外债对经济的影响是好还是不好(应该是E)

V4 by zizi_yj 710
第一段:交代了一下美国从credior变成了现在的debtor, trade deficit变多了。
第二段:但是对于美国这个trade deficit越来越多得表现美国的经济学家有两种解释。有一些economists认为这呈现的是这样一种image: 他们认为这是美国经济在发展,吸引了很多外来的Investment, 但是作者认为要是在经济发展吸引来的外来投资者,应该都在这些企业拥有ownership, 是direct investment, 但是实际上这些投资都是portfolio investment, 所以就有另一些economists觉得这确实还是美国经济在下滑的表现
第三段:貌似作者说了下自己的观点。这个记不太清了,大家看看寂静吧,很全的。

【考古确认】

考古一

V1:by cavashawn
美国从最大的债权国到最大的债务国,有人唱衰美国经济,认为美国经济下降了,但是有人说这是美国发展的象征,美国就像是一个新兴的企业,需要借很多钱发展。
V2:by kennybigmouth
关于美国外债的,记得以前做过的说。说美国外债越来越多了,这个现象有两类经济学家给出解释,第一类说,说明国外对美国的投资也增加了,这个是说明经济成功,但是作者把这个观点给批了,说投资分为固定资产投资和证券投资组合投资,前者的比例很少,大部分都是后者,也就是投资倒把。所以没有好处(有一道题问作者举这两类投资的例子为了做什么,很明显,反驳一类人的观点)  另一类经济学家说,外债说明竞争力下降了,balabala之类的,也就是斥资不断扩大。
第二段说作者自己的观点了,提到对这两类观点的评价吧。然后又提出了一个新解释,说美国自己的公司跨国投资的也多了。

(还有一道老规矩,主旨题,选项不要记得了,大家考古到原文可以归纳下)
Q1:主旨题
Q2:问这两类经济学家的辩论中都忽略的一个问题是什么,具体答案不太确定,貌似是D吧,选项反而记不清了,抱歉
Q3:有一道题问作者举这两类投资的例子为了做什么,很明显,反驳一类人的观点(黄色部分)
Q4:问了这两种观点的差异在哪里,楼主选的是他们就怎么看待外债对经济的影响有差异
Q5:competitive的proponent什麼觀點infer了什么?

考古二
V1:讲美国从creditor变成debtor到底是好是坏。两种理论,第一种说是好,将其比喻成rising corporation,說吸引外資,但是作者反對說investment 要看direct investment還是portfolio investment,有吸引力投資者就會直接投資(成為股東,共享盈虧),而投资组合ortfolio investment是沒有ownership的,美国的投资者都是用portfolio,所以该理论不成立(有一题)。第二种说是不好,比成falling ones。第二种更有说服力。但两者都没有考虑美国的跨国公司所起到的作用(有题,意思是问两种说法的共同点)。

V2:说美国是世界上负债最多的国家,一个学家说1这是经济强劲的表现,说这是2跨国公司在美国进行直接投资的结果,作者说美国现在大部分的外国公司是间接投资(出题:是in order to 的题,答案我选:反驳第一个人的观点)
另一个学家说这是美国经济萧条的表现……,最后作者说两个理论都没考虑经济全球化的因素(出题)


Q1:第一种说是好,将其比喻成rising corporation,但这种没有考虑到美国的投资者都是用portfolio(有一题)
Q2:两种说法的共同点:两者都没有考虑美国的跨国公司(globalization)所起到的作用
Q3:in order to题:作者说美国现在大部分的外国公司是间接投资的目的:我选:反驳第一个人的观点(跨国公司在美国进行直接投资的结果)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-7-24 21:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2026 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部