求教！提问一道逻辑！

似锦如荼

Greek tragedy, one of the enduring pillars of our belief system, dramatized the concept that the misfortune a person suffers is not an accident, but rather a logical outcome of flaws in that person’s nature; the misfortune is thus that person’s "fault." Nonetheless, today the public broadly supports bankruptcy protection, family welfare and other "social safety net" programs that shield the destitute in the face of their hardships, at taxpayer expense. Which of the following, if true, would best resolve the paradox in the statements above?
• A The ancient Greeks had few, if any, such social safety net programs in their society 
• B The majority of the public is more familiar with the works of Shakespeare than those of Greek tragedy  
• C Some people insist that society, not the individual, is to blame for most accidents  
• D Many people in financial difficulties feel too ashamed to declare bankruptcy or to take advantage of other social safety net programs  
• E The religions practiced by most people today strongly encourage people to contribute to charities that assist innocent people injured in natural disasters, such as hurricanes  

虽然知道别的都不对，但是e对在哪里了呢？天灾与公司破产这样的算一种吗？还是说攻击前面的不幸是人类自身的错误就可以了？

alzn2765

这题挺有代表性。如果你回在我的答疑贴里，我就答。

1998JIN

up一下，此题我也不会，这五个选项感觉都很无关
为啥是E ？？？？啥玩意啊？？？？？
啥玩意啊？？？？
有咩有大神会啊，感谢啊！

断了的弦

e是否是说虽然承认不幸是个人性格上的缺点但并不妨碍他们帮助那些不幸的人

Carol凡凡

Greek Tragedy里面认为人们碰到困难是因为他们自身所犯的错误。但是当代社会会用纳税人的钱去帮助那些遭到了困难的人。为什么？
这当中有个gap要填：因为现在的人认为有些困难（题目里列举的那些）是由自然灾害造成的（而不是Greek tragedy里面认为的是自身造成），所以现在的人会去帮助碰到困难的人们。
相当于现在的人找了个他因吧