请教Lawyer_1和各位NN关于assumption的问题

Xandria

请问lawyer_1和各位NN, assumption的题目里面答案是不是不可以出现原文没有出现的概念呢? 比如原文没有出现的比较和类似"Only"这种的概念?

今天在做OG195的时候发现选项里面出现无关的only被排除了. 谢谢!

A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
(A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
(B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
(C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
(D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
(E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.

kencheng

怎么说呢，BD两个选项的确是因为假设超出题干的范围而被排除的，而且一旦Assumption题型出现绝对化的概念成为错误选项的概率很大。但是并不是说只要出现了ONLY或者类似的绝对概念就一定不可能成为正确选项，还是应该看能否从题干给的条件推出该假设。

就题论题，思路应该是有些人为了获得税务上的优惠才捐赠--》取消此类优惠--》有些人就会减少捐款--》reduce services, and some would have to close their doors

BD的only source of funding与only individuals who donate money属于相同类型，把假设绝对化了，用题干中的条件是无论如何推不出来的。

Xandria

感谢兄台回复. 还是有点不解.

Conclusion的题目没什么可说的, 选项不可以出现原文没有涉及的概念; 但是assumption从逻辑上面考虑的话, 选项在逻辑顺序上面应该在文章前面, 所以不是很确定是否可以直接原文没有出现的因素的方式(就象做conclusion题目那样), 还望大家指点一下.

Xandria

Help!

Xandria

顶!