OG14 结论和反驳的对象

snowjing

14.   Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.

(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.

(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.

(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat-belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.（B）

(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.

请问此题中反驳的对象(黄色)和结论(绿色)似乎不一致？

若是，则该文章反驳部分对文章起到什么作用？谢谢

携隐

请楼主多用搜索功能，此题讨论过多次。如还有疑问，请在旧帖后继续跟贴提问。谢谢合作！

snowjing

版主，不是没有搜索啊。同一题但不是同一问题啊？

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=111451&replyID=&skin=0

XDJM的讨论并没有特地指明weaken的对象(黄色部分)是什么function,所以才有此一问。唉

swlfx

黄色部分是反对者的理论依据，绿色及以后部分是反对者的结论。

snowjing

明白了，黄色部分是反对前提。非常感谢swlfx。