ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5397|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全79,主题题型

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-16 16:05:00 | 只看该作者

大全79,主题题型

Passage 79 (16/22)


In most earthquakes the Earth’s crust cracks like porcelain. Stress builds up (build up: v.树立, 增进, 增大) until a fracture forms at a depth of a few kilometers and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth’s mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths?


That such deep events do occur has been accepted only since 1927, when the seismologist Kiyoo Wadati convincingly demonstrated their existence. Instead of comparing the arrival times of seismic waves at different locations, as earlier researchers had done. Wadati relied on a time difference between the arrival of primary (P) waves and the slower secondary (S) waves. Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to (in proportion to: adv....成比例) the distance from the earthquake focus (earthquake focus: 震源), or rupture point.


For most earthquakes, Wadati discovered, the interval was quite short near the epicenter (epicenter: n.震中, 中心), the point on the surface where shaking is strongest. For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter. Wadati saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. Most earthquakes had a small area of intense shaking, which weakened rapidly with increasing distance from the epicenter, but others were characterized by a lower peak intensity, felt over a broader area. Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested two kinds of earthquakes: the more common shallow events, in which the focus lay just under the epicenter, and deep events, with a focus several hundred kilometers down.


The question remained: how can such quakes occur, given (in view of (in view of: adv.考虑到, 由于): CONSIDERING “given what she knew about others' lives, how could she complain about her own? Marilyn F.”) that mantle rock at a depth of more than 50 kilometers is too ductile to store enough stress to fracture? Wadati’s work suggested that deep events occur in areas (now called Wadati-Benioff zones) where one crustal plate is forced under another and descends into the mantle. The descending rock is substantially cooler than the surrounding mantle and hence is less ductile and much more liable to fracture.


1.     The passage is primarily concerned with


(A) demonstrating why the methods of early seismologists were flawed


(B) arguing that deep events are poorly understood and deserve further study


(C) defending a revolutionary theory about the causes of earthquakes and methods of predicting them


(D) discussing evidence for the existence of deep events and the conditions that allow them to occurC


(E) comparing the effects of shallow events with those of deep events


这题我觉得DC也挺象答案的,怎么排除

沙发
发表于 2005-7-16 17:08:00 | 只看该作者

MM,主题啊,主题一定得是文章涉及最多的内容噢.


你看D,难道全文说了半天就为了讨论一些evidence?显然不是吗.


另外你是不是打错了?C不就是正确答案吗?是不是你怀疑E啊?E也同样是范围太狭窄,概括不了全文.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-16 17:43:00 | 只看该作者
多谢斑竹了,我的阅读真是惨哪, 近来多麻烦斑竹了
地板
发表于 2005-11-27 16:44:00 | 只看该作者
可是C中的method to predict在全文中并没有提到
5#
发表于 2006-4-10 11:00:00 | 只看该作者

支持D.


C是比较明显的无关.

6#
发表于 2007-7-5 05:15:00 | 只看该作者
我选了D,C中的defend似乎在文章中没体现啊
7#
发表于 2008-5-3 10:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用三脚猫在2005-7-16 16:05:00的发言:

Passage 79 (16/22)

In most earthquakes the Earth’s crust cracks like porcelain. Stress builds up (build up: v.树立, 增进, 增大) until a fracture forms at a depth of a few kilometers and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth’s mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths?

That such deep events do occur has been accepted only since 1927, when the seismologist Kiyoo Wadati convincingly demonstrated their existence. Instead of comparing the arrival times of seismic waves at different locations, as earlier researchers had done. Wadati relied on a time difference between the arrival of primary (P) waves and the slower secondary (S) waves. Because P and S waves travel at different but fairly constant speeds, the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to (in proportion to: adv....成比例) the distance from the earthquake focus (earthquake focus: 震源), or rupture point.

For most earthquakes, Wadati discovered, the interval was quite short near the epicenter (epicenter: n.震中, 中心), the point on the surface where shaking is strongest. For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter. Wadati saw a similar pattern when he analyzed data on the intensity of shaking. Most earthquakes had a small area of intense shaking, which weakened rapidly with increasing distance from the epicenter, but others were characterized by a lower peak intensity, felt over a broader area. Both the P-S intervals and the intensity patterns suggested two kinds of earthquakes: the more common shallow events, in which the focus lay just under the epicenter, and deep events, with a focus several hundred kilometers down.

The question remained: how can such quakes occur, given (in view of (in view of: adv.考虑到, 由于): CONSIDERING “given what she knew about others' lives, how could she complain about her own? Marilyn F.”) that mantle rock at a depth of more than 50 kilometers is too ductile to store enough stress to fracture? Wadati’s work suggested that deep events occur in areas (now called Wadati-Benioff zones) where one crustal plate is forced under another and descends into the mantle. The descending rock is substantially cooler than the surrounding mantle and hence is less ductile and much more liable to fracture.

1.     The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) demonstrating why the methods of early seismologists were flawed

(B) arguing that deep events are poorly understood and deserve further study

(C) defending a revolutionary theory about the causes of earthquakes and methods of predicting them

(D) discussing evidence for the existence of deep events and the conditions that allow them to occurC

(E) comparing the effects of shallow events with those of deep events

这题我觉得DC也挺象答案的,怎么排除

我也選(D)

第一段的最後一句點出了文章討論的重點:深層地震

第二段的開頭deep events,第二段跟第三段的內容是W的發現,證明deep event的存在

最後一段呼應第一段,回答深層地震的產生原因

8#
发表于 2008-9-30 13:31:00 | 只看该作者

应该是D吧,C中说讨论了causes of earthquakes ,文章中好像没有讨论地震形成的原因吧

9#
发表于 2010-4-23 11:53:26 | 只看该作者
第三题翻出来再问一下:
3.    It can be inferred from the passage that if the S waves from an earthquake arrive at a given location(这没说是震心,所以不能作为判断是deep event 的根据吧?) long after the P waves, which of the following must be true(要找一个必要条件)?
(A) The earthquake was a deep event.
(B) The earthquake was a shallow event.
(C) The earthquake focus was distant.
(D) The earthquake focus was nearby.
(E) The earthquake had a low peak intensity.
我选E,因为第三段作者说:对多数地震来说:在震心P和S之间间隔短,而上一段结尾说了一个规律是P和S的间隔时间随着与震心的距离增加而增加,可以推之对多数地震在离震心够远的地方,S比P来得晚很多,这样那些地方应该是low peak intensity,而如果是deep events那就是low peak intensity.所以选择E,答案是A,我不明白。。。
10#
发表于 2010-6-9 00:31:55 | 只看该作者
我今天这道题目也错了,主旨题,选的是D,因为我觉得C有点问题....一查竟然还是历史遗留问题

3.题,貌似并没有给出low peak和rapid weaken两种现象所对应地震类型把....只是说这intense pattern和ps patten都能suggest两种类型的地震
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-8 14:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部