ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

A significant number of Qualitex Corporation's department heads are due to retire this year. The number of employees other than current department heads who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of the expected vacancies. Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one department, so some departments will be without department heads next year unless Qualitex ______.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2525|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd-13-7 很菜的问题,搜索没有

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-9 21:30:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]gwd-13-7 很菜的问题,搜索没有

Q7:


Which of the following most logically completes the argument?



A significant number of Qualitex Corporation’s department heads are due to retire this year.  The number of employees other than current department heads who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of the expected vacancies.  Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one department, so some departments will be without department heads next year unless Qualitex ______.




  • promotes some current department heads to higher-level managerial positions

  • raises the salary for department heads

  • reduces the number of new employees it hires next year

  • reduces the average number of employees per department

  • reduces the number of its departments

  • 很菜的问题,因为原题中的选项编码问题,想确认一下答案


    是E


    reduces the number of its departments吗


    真受不了这种题目,看晕了


    谢谢!!!

    沙发
    发表于 2005-7-10 00:21:00 | 只看该作者
    是,如果接替现有的部门头的人员只有一半,而公司又不想到外面去招聘,那么如果这些部门继续存在的话,结果只有一种,一半的部门没有头;公司如果不想看到这种情况发生,只能解散那些没有头的部门了.所以E对.ABCD对解决问题都没有什么帮助.
    板凳
    发表于 2006-2-10 11:34:00 | 只看该作者

    我做这题时的想法是,如果解散那些没有领导的部分不就等于合并了一些部门吗?可文中给出的条件又是不能让current department heads take over more than one department,这不是和题干的前提相反吗?


    哪位NN能指教一下我这样的逻辑有什么问题啊???谢谢啦!!!

    地板
    发表于 2006-12-11 20:29:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用differentchen在2006-2-10 11:34:00的发言:

    我做这题时的想法是,如果解散那些没有领导的部分不就等于合并了一些部门吗?可文中给出的条件又是不能让current department heads take over more than one department,这不是和题干的前提相反吗?

    我觉的这句是楼上mm的主观臆断,没有任何条件说会有合并的可能啊 ,也许就此彻底不要这样的部门也有可能的哦

    5#
    发表于 2008-1-16 10:45:00 | 只看该作者

    从有关,无关,可以更好的排除。问题的。

    题中指出的是“部门空缺的职位&部门的问题”

    BCD只是涉及到,薪水,有部门数量是无关的。

    A只会导致经理更缺少,。。。只有E涉及到,部门数量的问题

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 06:38
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部