ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The Nile Delta of Egypt was invaded and ruled from 1650 to 1550 B.C. by a people called the Hyksos. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos invasion.

In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists' evidence,it would be most useful to determine which of the following?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2672|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问一道prep上面的题目,万分感激额

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-9-30 11:10:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
9.The Nile Delta of Egypt was invaded and from 1650 to 1550 B.C. by a people called the Hyksos. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists’ evidence, it would be most useful to determine which of the following?
A.Whether there were some artifacts found at Avaris that were unlike those produced in Ashkelon but that date to before 1700 B.C.  
B.Whether the Hyksos ruled any other part of Egypt besides the Delta in the period from 1650 to 1550 B.C.
C.Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan  
D.Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avaris  
E.Whether many of the artifacts found at Avaris that are similar to artifacts produced in Ashkelon date to well before the Hyksos invasion  

答案;E
我不太明白A选项,有没有大牛可以给我解释一下,谢谢啦!!!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2015-9-30 15:37:29 | 只看该作者
果因推理找削弱/支持

前提(果): excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos invasion
结论(因):the Hyksos were Canaanites

前提和结论之间有一个gap:  虽然Avaris发现的artifacts跟Ashkelon的一样,但并没有说哪个在前哪个在后。也就是究竟是Avaris发现的artifacts是从Ashkelon来的(这样就支持结论)?还是Ashkelon的artifacts是从Avaris来的(这样就削弱结论)?
E正好填补了这个gap: Whether many of the artifacts found at Avaris that are similar to artifacts produced in Ashkelon date to well before the Hyksos invasion. 许多Avaris发现的artifacts都是the Hyksos invasion之前的。

A选项that were unlike those produced in Ashkelon but that date to before 1700 B.C修饰some artifacts found at Avaris
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2015-9-30 20:35:37 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-9-30 15:37
果因推理找削弱/支持

前提(果): excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered ...

太感谢了,终于弄明白了,一开始没理解A选项两个that都是修饰some artifacts found at Avaris。
地板
发表于 2016-4-20 20:59:08 | 只看该作者
alzn2765 发表于 2015-9-30 15:37
果因推理找削弱/支持

前提(果): excavations of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 12:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部