tania的考试复习计划贴：谢谢大家的帮助和支持！！M51,V41,760!

AegeanSea2006

以下是引用wwwhahchn在2005-9-15 16:06:00的发言：


可是not ... but ... 也要求平行啊，E就是不平行让人搞不清楚

哦，那倒是。。。算了，这道题放水了。。

tania

以下是引用wwwhahchn在2005-9-15 14:55:00的发言：

not only created没有问题啊，关键是it是否多余

not only ... , but also ... 的also是可省的

刚从google找到的句子，跟E一样

Conspiracy theories are not only frequently wrong, but they alienate swing voters.

如果E的it不多余，无疑giving是最好的

这里有are，E选项中没有助动词，单独使用了not，这是不可以的

wwwhahchn

天山-M-4-28

以下是引用Youknowme在2005-9-15 17:12:00的发言：

首先是对DS的理解,答案唯一.

Q28:
A school administrator will assign each student in a group of n students to one of m
classrooms. If 3 < m < 13 < n, is it possible to assign each of the n students to one of the
m classrooms so that each classroom has the same number of students assigned to it?
(1) It is possible to assign each of 3n students to one of m classrooms so that each
classroom has the same number of students assigned to it.
(2) It is possible to assign each of 13n students to one of m classrooms so that each
classroom has the same number of students assigned to it.
A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

分析：

条件一其实就是3N能被M整除。因为3<M<13<N，举例说明，有9个教室，18个学生（18=3*6），18能被9整除，但是6不能被9整除，不充分；

条件二其实就是13N能被M整除。因为3<M<13<N，13N能被M整除，所以N肯定是M的倍数。也就是说N能被M整除，单独充分。

所以选B

理解的问题

wwwhahchn

以下是引用tania在2005-9-15 16:41:00的发言：

这里有are，E选项中没有助动词，单独使用了not，这是不可以的

OG-94：The psychologist William James believed that facial expressions not only provide a visible sign of an emotion but also actually contribute to the feeling itself.

这个不是跟E一样的么？？

tania

我是这么理解的，如果是not  only....but also 的用法，可以；如果是not only...but...的用法（好像在og 中看过如果表达不但而且的意思的话，also是不可以省略的），那就不是不仅而且的意思了，就是纯粹的表转折的用法，所以不存在并列的问题，前面的not也不能单独使用了

不知对不对，大家探讨

ring_cheng

关于not only,,but also的用法，我记得在GWD有道SC题（好像是GWD8吧）特别典型，也特别变态。当时大家也都讨论了N长的贴子，有时间TANIA可以翻出来看看，希望会有些启发。

还有几天了，MM加油！！

vacationer

以下是引用tania在2005-9-15 14:13:00的发言：

忽然觉得想通了，不管考的如何，这个世界还有很美丽的，爱你的人依然爱你，关心你的人依然关心你，这就够了，考试这种事在整个人生中实在算不了什么，不能让它主宰我们的情绪，我们要做的只是每天完成任务就ok啦！！通过cd，认识了3w，沧海，baby，vacationer，爱琴海，番茄，ethyl等等还有好多人这就是最好的啦（怎么有点像心经？？）

说真的，我现在连作文都不着急了，虽然ai几乎还没看，实在不行就来回说呗，这两天看看提纲就是了，着急也没啥用

而且看到自己连gwd分类总结都作完了，觉得就很高兴，至少碰到gwd的题目能有点保证啊，所以就很高兴啦

tania  心态不错哦,赞一个!

不过tania准备的已经很充分了.不像我,数学机井,作文都没看完,GWD分类总结还剩一点没完, 好像也不紧张,真奇怪呢

vacationer

以下是引用wwwhahchn在2005-9-15 14:55:00的发言：

not only created没有问题啊，关键是it是否多余

not only ... , but also ... 的also是可省的

刚从google找到的句子，跟E一样

Conspiracy theories are not only frequently wrong, but they alienate swing voters.

如果E的it不多余，无疑giving是最好的

我觉得it是多余的,而且ets好像比较prefer "not only...but also"这样完整的说法.

而D没有not only,所以就不存在这个问题了.

tania

以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-9-15 22:10:00的发言：

关于not only,,but also的用法，我记得在GWD有道SC题（好像是GWD8吧）特别典型，也特别变态。当时大家也都讨论了N长的贴子，有时间TANIA可以翻出来看看，希望会有些启发。

还有几天了，MM加油！！

ring_cheng，我们就是在说这道题目

天山-7-16（GWD-8-20）

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

B. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

C. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

D. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

E. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

3w对其中的E选项有些不清楚，可我觉得这里高亮部分的用法就不对，要么应该是not only...but also...，这里的not 可单独使用，要么not only..., but  但是其中的not 不能单独用，应该有个助动词，比如这里应该用did not only creat，因为他已经不是not only... but also 的用法了，不存在对称平行的问题，就是两个句子。你觉得呢？？

面对沧海，一声笑

下班第一件事就是给大家加油了。