ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: melodyji
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD 12-8

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-11-1 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

motive为什么就要被排除呢?


明明是在说那几个机构在怀疑这个立法是为了减少女性的就业机会吗!

12#
发表于 2005-11-8 00:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oceanalma在2005-10-11 13:15:00的发言:

e怎么也不对呢,不理解阿,谁能指点指点


e中evaluating错


文中没有对任何一个组织的论点进行评价,只是把他们都列出来了,所以用B中的contrasting合适

13#
发表于 2005-11-8 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joanrain在2005-11-1 12:04:00的发言:

motive为什么就要被排除呢?


明明是在说那几个机构在怀疑这个立法是为了减少女性的就业机会吗!


文中并没有提到motive阿!MM不要把自己的想法加到文中去。文章说什么我们就知道什么。更何况这是主题提!

14#
发表于 2006-10-7 21:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用libbytt在2005-11-8 0:01:00的发言:

e中evaluating错

文中没有对任何一个组织的论点进行评价,只是把他们都列出来了,所以用B中的contrasting合适

我觉得B中的reasoning也有错啊, 文中并没有REASONING的过程.

但和A相比,似乎更好些.

GWD的选项区分度很小,太容易错了.

15#
发表于 2007-1-16 11:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用libbytt在2005-11-8 0:03:00的发言:

文中并没有提到motive阿!MM不要把自己的想法加到文中去。文章说什么我们就知道什么。更何况这是主题提!

这题和motive无关的,motive的意思就是the reason that makes someone do something, especially when this reason is kept hidden

在这里不就是 the reason that makes那些机构oppose proposal吗?

真正A,B的区别是present和contrast

文章里有

 (30)      SPEW contended, and WIDC

concurred, that controllable

conditions in such factories

       were responsible for the devel-

opment of lead poisoning.

 

(WTUL), which

had ceased in the late 1880’s

 (45)      to oppose restrictions on

women’s labor--这个是WIDC的观点

所以有contrast在里面


16#
发表于 2007-2-12 22:08:00 | 只看该作者
这边没有contrast,concur是赞同的意思,oppose是他意见里面的内容,而并非针对其他组织观点的oppose.
17#
发表于 2007-4-7 06:39:00 | 只看该作者

    

GWD29-Q21

The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which
of the following ways?


    

                       


    
  1. WIDC
         believed that the existing safety regulations were adequate to protect
         women’s health, whereas WTUL believed that such regulations needed to be
         strengthened.
  2. WIDC
         believed that unions could not succeed in pressuring employers to comply
         with such regulations, whereas WTUL believed that unions could succeed in
         doing so.
  3. WIDC
         believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided by
         controlling conditions there, whereas WTUL believed that lead poisoning in
         such factories could not be avoided no matter how stringently safety
         regulations were enforced.
  4. At the
         time that the legislation concerning white lead factories was proposed,
         WIDC was primarily concerned with addressing health conditions in white
         lead factories, whereas WTUL was concerned with improving working conditions
         in all types of factories.
  5. At the time that WIDC was opposing
         legislative attempts to restrict women’s labor, WTUL had already ceased to
         do so
answer: E, but why not C?????

18#
发表于 2007-7-1 20:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用luckypf99在2007-4-7 6:39:00的发言:

 

GWD29-Q21

The passage suggests that WIDC differed from WTUL in which
of the following ways?


 

                       


 
  1. WIDC
         believed that the existing safety regulations were adequate to protect
         women’s health, whereas WTUL believed that such regulations needed to be
         strengthened.
  2. WIDC
         believed that unions could not succeed in pressuring employers to comply
         with such regulations, whereas WTUL believed that unions could succeed in
         doing so.
  3. WIDC
         believed that lead poisoning in white lead factories could be avoided by
         controlling conditions there, whereas WTUL believed that lead poisoning in
         such factories could not be avoided no matter how stringently safety
         regulations were enforced.
  4. At the
         time that the legislation concerning white lead factories was proposed,
         WIDC was primarily concerned with addressing health conditions in white
         lead factories, whereas WTUL was concerned with improving working conditions
         in all types of factories.
  5. At the time that WIDC was opposing
         legislative attempts to restrict women’s labor, WTUL had already ceased to
         do so
answer: E, but why not C?????

啊我的卷子里怎么没有这道题?这篇文章不是只有三道么。。。
19#
发表于 2007-7-7 21:24:00 | 只看该作者

第10题的B和E很迷惑

但是E确实有问题,evaluate不存在

只是列出了两种做法

20#
发表于 2007-10-23 12:59:00 | 只看该作者
我一开始觉得A对,现在支持B了.服气,还是没有把握好大局,火候不行.

A: presenting various groups' views of the motives of those proposing certain legislation.

展示了不同团体的观点,什么观点呢,就是关于"这些立案被提出"的动机,各个团体有各自的看法:

WIDC认为是又一个限制女人工作的借口.(reasoning过程是: 通过质疑立法动机,反对这个立法)

SPEW没有质疑立法的动机,只是提出反对的理由(REASONING过程)

WTUL也是提出反对的理由(reasoning),没有质疑当局的动机.


所以B了


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-6 05:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部