ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1102|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大神们求解一道逻辑题目 在线等 拜托啦

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-8-20 17:33:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?
  (A) In 1982 more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.
  (B) In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.
  (C) Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982.
  (D) Many of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in 1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995.
  (E) The rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than the overall rate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-20 17:35:30 | 只看该作者
我是真心不知道这个A是怎么得来的 求大神讲解详细的数学化过程
板凳
发表于 2015-8-21 05:27:47 | 只看该作者
我是这么想的:
这题我理解就是一个关于基数的问题,虽然lp的人数增加很多,然并卵,share并没有增加,为什么呢?因lp工作的人本来基数就大呗。设想一下,如果1982年lp有100人, hp只有10人。在13年间lp增加了50人,只相当于增加了0.5倍,但hp只要增加10人就相当于增加了原来人数的一倍辣。
b项说的是1995年的关系,但是看share(%)的增加应该分母是1982年吧,所以无关
c项说了他因,跟要比较的两者无关
d项只说了lp的人变化了,跟基数无关,排除
e项的话给人感觉lp公司变多了,跟招多少人无关吧, 排除

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 23:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部