ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2424|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助啊!!!!!!!!!!SC里的比较题快把我整疯了!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-8-15 22:29:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
第一次发帖我也不知道格式什么的对不对,我现在对这个比较结构简直无奈,求大神解答疑惑!!
上例题:
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.

A. wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is

B. wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be

C. wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be

D. total fat of wild animals is less than livestock fed on grain and they have more fat of a kind thought to be

E. total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain and more of their fat is of a kind they think is

红色即正确答案,我知道这个题大多数人是纠结B和C,好吧,我很无奈纠结的是A和B,是因为!!我之前看了这么一个例句的解析:
stresses girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those boys experience.
在以上这个例句里,我最开始不懂为什么会有than 后面的are这个词,后来看到解析说,因为than前面是主谓宾齐全的,所以为了避免造成歧义要补出be动词表示是主语在进行比较,
那么我的问题就来了,在我发出来的这个题里,than前面的wild animals have less total fat也是主谓宾都齐全啊,那than后面为什么不需要补东西呢?
另外要问一起问一下,这个句子里traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are the current one,为什么要有they are呢,我真的好头疼~~!!!
附上我说的那个例句解析的链接~!http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-536547-1-1.html

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-15 22:30:42 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下  大家快来救救我~~~TAT  5555  马上就要考了啊
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-15 22:35:47 | 只看该作者
大家都睡了吗
地板
发表于 2015-8-16 02:32:42 | 只看该作者
Ron:

you've learned a lesson here: the gmat's preference for that 'do' is not absolute.

from a 100% strict semantic viewpoint, i agree with you here: there's technically an ambiguity. however, we now have evidence, in the form of this problem, that the gmat doesn't consider ALL of these 'ambiguities' as truly ambiguous. rather, provided that the 'second meaning' is sufficiently absurd AND nonparallel (note the obvious logical nonparallelism of compairing total fat to livestock), it's ok to eliminate the 'do'.

sigh.

remember, we don't make the rules; they do. but with each problem like this one that you study, you'll have a better idea of exactly what their rules are.

下次有问题用一下谷歌,说不定很快就能得到圆满的答案
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/according-to-recent-studies-comparing-the-nutritional-value-t718.html

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2015-8-16 09:21:17 | 只看该作者
zbyloveinter 发表于 2015-8-16 02:32
Ron:

you've learned a lesson here: the gmat's preference for that 'do' is not absolute.

谢谢啦  帮了我很大忙呀~~~~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 17:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部