OG CR 54，关于“假设题”理解的疑惑

ileroyoverstep

刚才做到54，发现自己一下子不太懂“假设题”的定义，曼哈顿里面说的是“找出原文没有说出的假设（文章没有该假设则无法成立）”，而这道题的假设内容却是原文中的重现。The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise.
Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?
(A)        Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B)        More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.
(D)        If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.
(E)        If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type ot advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.
这里面两个有着下划线的部分感觉是一模一样的，所以不是很理解，是因为这里的advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements没说的话就不一定属于The fewer restrictions么？这里求赐教。
如果不是的话，感觉和做的其它同类题型不太一样，因为其它题型都是明显的缺少GAP。以下是自己的错题本分析，请NN赐教，在此先谢过！

ileroyoverstep

自己顶一下，求指点

alzn2765

谁说这是假设题的？
这明显是推论题啊！

ileroyoverstep

alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-12 23:25
谁说这是假设题的？
这明显是推论题啊！

谢谢大侠，我发觉自己错的好明显。。。难怪半天都想不出来，我现在就回去补知识

ileroyoverstep

alzn2765 发表于 2015-8-12 23:25
谁说这是假设题的？
这明显是推论题啊！

之前看到完全相反了。。。