GWD-1-Q14: That the application of new technology can increase the productivity of existing coal mines is demonstrated by the case of Tribnia's coal industry. Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.
Which of the following can be properly concluded from the statement about coal output per miner in the passage?
A. If the number of miners working in Tribnian coal mines has remained constant in the past five years, Tribnia's total coal production has doubled in that period of time. B. Any individual Tribnian coal mine that achieved an increase in overall output in the past five years has also experienced an increase in output per miner. C. If any new coal mines had opened in Tribnia in the past five years, then the increase in output per miner would have been even greater than it actually was. D. If any individual Tribnian coal mine has not increased its output per miner in the past five years, then that mine's overall output has declined or remained constant. E. In Tribnia the cost of producing a given quantity of coal has declined over the past five years.
答案是A没问题!
以前的讨论我都认真看了,仍有如下疑问,请NN帮忙解决,谢谢!
1。题目中‘Coal output per miner in Tribnia is double what it was five years ago, even though no new mines have opened.’有让步的意思:尽管没有建新矿井,可是矿工的人均煤产量比五年前加倍了。可是这里的让步我怎么绝对那么别扭呢?!建新矿井和人均煤产量能构成让步关系吗??
2。even though为什么不可以像if那样取反呢?从意思的角度看:尽管没有建新矿井,可是矿工的人均煤产量比五年前加倍了。那么可以得到如下结论:如果有新矿井建成,矿工的人均煤产量要比实际的增长更大。这就是答案C啊!为什么不可以这样推理呢??
请NN指教,谢谢! |