A recent study has provided clues to predator-prey dynamics in the late Pleistocene era.
Researchers compared the number of tooth fractures in present-day carnivores with tooth fractures
in carnivores that lived 36,000 to 10,000 years ago and that were preserved in the Rancho La Brea
tar pits in Los Angeles. The breakage frequencies in the extinct species were strikingly higher than
those in the present-day species.
In considering possible explanations for this finding, the researchers dismissed demographic bias
because older individuals were not overrepresented in the fossil samples. They rejected
preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that
the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits. They ruled out local bias because
breakage data obtained from other Pleistocene sites were similar to the La Brea data. The
explanation they consider most plausible is behavioral differences between extinct and present-day
carnivores-in particular, more contact between the teeth of predators and the bones of prey due to
more thorough consumption of carcasses by the extinct species. Such thorough carcass
consumption implies to the researchers either that prey availability was low, at least seasonally, or
that there was intense competition over kills and a high rate of carcass theft due to relatively high
predator densities.
怎么格式有点乱?
黄色的一句重要的论点我按句意理解的是: 他们反对保存的偏见因为一个在两灭绝物种总的断裂的缺乏证明断裂不是磨损的结果. 怎么就不通呢? NN给我指点一下. |