|
不知道是否已经有本体的讨论，如有烦请高人指点url
Mr. Janeck: I don’t believe Stevenson will win the election for governor. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.
Ms. Siuzdak: You’re wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state government.
M. Siuzdak’s response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck’s remark to imply which of the following?
(A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governor.
(B) No candidate without political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
(C) Mr. Janeck believes that political leadership and business leadership are closely analogous.
(D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one’s ability to run a state government fairly.
(E) Voters generally overestimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.
the answer is A; but i think D is better
In response to Mr.Janeck's argument that a businessman without political experience can not be responsible, Ms.Siuzdak mentioned that the experience as a businessman is a good preparation for being a political government.
why not D? | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-6-7 05:18:00
楼主
