og-34

tania

34. In 1985 state border colleges in Texas lost the enrollment of more than half, on average, of the Mexican nationals they had previously served each year. Teaching faculties have alleged that this extreme drop resulted from a rise in tuition for international and out-of-state students from $ 40 to $ 120 per credit hour.

Which of the following, if feasible, offers the best prospects for alleviating the problem of the drop in enrollment of Mexican nationals as the teaching faculties assessed it?

A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities.

B. Allowing Mexican nationals to study in Texas border colleges and to pay in-state tuition rates, which are the same as the previous international rate

C. Reemphasizing the goals and mission of the Texas state border colleges as serving both in-state students and Mexican nationals

D. Increasing the financial resources of Texas colleges by raising the tuition for in-state students attending state institutions

E. Offering career counseling for those Mexican nationals who graduate from state border colleges and intend to return to Mexico

A选项从意思上讲，是不是为Mexican nationals 提供资金上的援助，这一样也可以减少Mexican nationals 的学费负担，从而入学学生会增多啊。为何不对呢？请大家多指教

flylion

翻译大致正确但是　提供资金的资助不是解决入学问题的根本途径啊　原题没有提及　　只有Ｂ　最合理减少成本　当然就不用再去解决资金问题

思谦

我的理解A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities是给Mexican nationals资助在Mexican universities中学习，这当然不会缓解state border colleges in Texas减少 的 enrollment 啦，不知对不对，请nn们指正

biss33

以下是引用思谦在2005-7-16 23:00:00的发言：

我的理解A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities是给Mexican nationals资助在Mexican universities中学习，这当然不会缓解state border colleges in Texas减少 的 enrollment 啦，不知对不对，请nn们指正

（偶不是nn)同意！原题的逻辑重点enroment in Texas(美国得克萨斯）

a的攻击出发点enroment in Mexicans(墨西哥）

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-16 23:10:02编辑过]

KATIEUS