ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1421|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og-30-185

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-31 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

og-30-185


Passage 30


Excess inventory, a massive problem for many busi-


nesses, has several causes, some of which are unavoidable.


Overstocks may accumulate through production overruns or


errors. Certain styles and colors prove unpopular. With


(5) some products—computers and software, toys, and


books—last year’s models are difficult to move even at


huge discounts. Occasionally the competition introduces a


better product. But in many cases the public’s buying tastes


simply change, leaving a manufacturer or distributor with


(10 ) thousands (or millions) of items that the fickle public no


longer wants.


One common way to dispose of this merchandise is to


sell it to a liquidator, who buys as cheaply as possible and


then resells the merchandise through catalogs, discount


(15) stores, and other outlets. However, liquidators may pay less


for the merchandise than it cost to make it. Another way to


dispose of excess inventory is to dump it. The corporation


takes a straight cost write-off on its taxes and hauls the


merchandise to a landfill. Although it is hard to believe,


(20) there is a sort of convoluted logic to this approach. It is


perfectly legal, requires little time or preparation on the


company’s part, and solves the problem quickly. The draw-


back is the remote possibility of getting caught by the news


media. Dumping perfectly useful products can turn into a


(25) public relations nightmare. Children living in poverty are


freezing and XYZ Company has just sent 500 new snow-


suits to the local dump. Parents of young children are


barely getting by and QPS Company dumps 1,000 cases of


disposable diapers because they have slight imperfections.


(30) The managers of these companies are not deliberately


wasteful; they are simply unaware of all their alternatives.


In 1976 the Internal Revenue Service provided a tangible


incentive for businesses to contribute their products to char-


ity. The new tax law allowed corporations to deduct the


(35)cost of the product donated plus half the difference


between cost and fair market selling price, with the proviso


that deductions cannot exceed twice cost. Thus, the federal


government sanctions—indeed, encourages—an above-cost


federal tax deduction for companies that donate inventory


to charity.



185. The passage provides information that supports which of the following statements?


(A) Excess inventory results most often from insufficient market analysis by the manufacturer.


(B) Products with slight manufacturing defects may contribute to excess inventory.


(C) Few manufacturers have taken advantage of the changes in the federal tax laws.


(D) Manufacturers who dump their excess inventory are often caught and exposed by the news media.


(E) Most products available in discount stores have come from manufacturers’ excess-inventory stock.



185.


The best answer is B. “Products with slight manufacturing defects may contribute to excess


inventory,” is supported by lines 2-3, which assert that “production … error” can contribute to


excess inventory. Lines 27-29, which describe a scenario illustrating the exposure of


excess-inventory dumping, also support B: “QRS Company dumps…diapers because they have


slight imperfections.” The passage does not mention “market analysis” (choice A), nor does it


include information about the relative proportion either of “manufacturers that have taken


advantage of tax laws” (choice C) or of products in discount stores that come from


excess-inventory stock (choice E). Far from being supported, D groundlessly asserts that the


“remote possibility” described in lines 23-24 occurs “often.”



A、E文章没提及;C few ;D often


这样我就得出了B,但OG的解释我并没懂,那位牛牛帮帮我,谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2005-6-1 12:32:00 | 只看该作者

The passage does not mention “market analysis” (choice A),
全文没有论及“市场分析”,所以A错。


nor does it include information about the relative proportion either of“manufacturers that have taken advantage of tax laws” (choice C)
比例问题没有提及,即没有说是few,所以C错。


or of products in discount stores that come from excess-inventory stock (choice E).
比例没有提及,即没有说是most,所以E错。


Far from being supported, D groundlessly asserts that the remote possibility” described in lines 23-24 occurs “often.”
often错,所以D错。



总之。A,"market analysis",无。C,few,无 。D,often,反。 E, most,无。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-27 10:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部