ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2385|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 OG-79

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-7 21:49:00 | 只看该作者

求助 OG-79

79 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.






Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?






(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?



(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?



(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?



(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?



(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?



这道题看不懂,答案为什么是A。


沙发
发表于 2005-5-7 22:30:00 | 只看该作者

那个解释的假说是说,两部分分离,全然无关。

可是A的意思是,如果全然无关,为什么参加没有人回答YES呢?言下之意,被测人的答案说明两部分还是有关联的。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-8 00:02:00 | 只看该作者

I got it.Thanks

地板
发表于 2005-5-8 00:06:00 | 只看该作者
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-8 09:28:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks 我爱欧洲.
6#
发表于 2006-7-30 17:27:00 | 只看该作者

看了半天还是没明白为什么D不对,请大家讨论

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 05:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部