ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5276|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-4-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-3 14:53:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-4-14

Q14:


Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?




  • The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

  • Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

  • The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

  • The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

  • The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930

  • 这道题答案给的D。我选E。认为E是他因削弱,quality变差不是因为carpenter不敬业,是因为要求完工的时间短了。大牛指点。

    沙发
    发表于 2005-5-4 11:56:00 | 只看该作者

    我觉得E的意思是说学徒期短了。小师傅还没有学成就出来混了。所以自然是LESS SKILLFUL。是STRENTHEN 没有WEAKEN

    不过D对在什么地方好象不甚明白啊。只是其他四项都不对,而D又没错所以我觉得选D。不知道TONYADIDASGG有什么指教?

    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2005-5-4 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

    那个apprenticeship是学徒期啊,我今天才查字典

    关于D的一点愚见:1。首先the more, the more的结构一般是不对的,因为就我做过的题目来看CR很难接受从文章推出线性成比例关系。2。造得木工技艺越好月不容易坏,这应该加强的说。难道说是:造得越好越难更新,不利于城市建设。这明显违反CR的白痴原则啊。错了两次了,各位看帖的隐身牛帮衬一下啊……

    地板
    发表于 2005-5-4 20:20:00 | 只看该作者

    哦GG这么一说提示了我。似乎是这样从题目来看它用了original一词也就是说新的都是为了replace旧的而存在的,也就是说如果不是旧的坏了也就不会有新的。

    那么从D就可以推出来原来的木工并没有比现在的木工尽心尽力了。

    GG觉得这样解释对吗?

    5#
    发表于 2005-5-5 16:31:00 | 只看该作者

    D说的是质量越好,用的越勤. 也就是说正是因为1930年之后的质量好,所以用的多,当作者去看的时候,当然质量就不如1930年之前的了(因为1930年之前的质量不好,用的不多)

    E说学徒期,是无关的. 因为题目的reasoning是:现在的质量好--->建造时的质量好,技术高什么的. 是明显的现象-->结论型

    要反驳的话应该就其现象来讲. D就是反驳了arguer的现象

    6#
    发表于 2005-5-5 18:27:00 | 只看该作者

    The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished。

    这个没有看出来时质量越好用的越勤啊?貌似是说质量越好越不容易坏呀

    7#
    发表于 2005-5-5 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

    我觉得答案应该是B啊.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

    请大牛指教

    8#
    发表于 2005-5-6 09:58:00 | 只看该作者

    旅馆容纳的人多了质量就应该差一点有点强词夺理

    9#
    发表于 2005-5-9 03:09:00 | 只看该作者

    D made me confused.

    Any NN ,please help

    10#
    发表于 2005-7-5 22:13:00 | 只看该作者

    我也是选的b,看了上面的解释,觉得b也是不充分的。并不是说住的人多,使用的就多。


    另外就d这个答案,我是这样理解的,既然题干里面说了,是1930年前木匠比1930年后的木匠强,问的是weaken


    那么最直接的就是指出the quality of carpentry 上的不同。carpentry和carpenter的联系是最紧密的


    不知道这样理解对不对。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-10 10:59
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部