ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2533|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道GWD的BF题。

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-22 19:24:00 | 只看该作者

一道GWD的BF题。

Q21:


Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.  They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.  That plan is ill-conceived:  if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.  On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable.  But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.  And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.



In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?




  • The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.

  • The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.

  • The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.

  • The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.

  • The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

    我选了a


    however,答案居然是D。费解了……高人指点一下吧

  • 沙发
    发表于 2005-4-22 20:33:00 | 只看该作者

    I think D should be better than A.

    The second boldface should not be the ground of the rejection to the first boldface. The first one is presented as ill-conceived because " developers would outbid any other bidders."

    And the second boldface is the basis of the argument's solution, which is to help the farmers to modenlize their lands.

    板凳
    发表于 2005-4-22 20:47:00 | 只看该作者

    我不是高手。

    这题肯定是选D的。第一个划线部分是个goal,但是文章没有说这个goal不能实现呀。特别是最后一句说,应该有个更加考虑周全的方案才好。

    另外,请楼主把题号标清楚,方便后来人。

    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2005-4-23 11:07:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用tuzq在2005-4-22 20:47:00的发言:

    我不是高手。


    这题肯定是选D的。第一个划线部分是个goal,但是文章没有说这个goal不能实现呀。特别是最后一句说,应该有个更加考虑周全的方案才好。


    另外,请楼主把题号标清楚,方便后来人。


    这是我在做那个最新题13套里第二套的一个题,可是那个第二套只有逻辑啊,不是有41题那种的摸考题,所以我也不知道该怎么写题号了

    5#
    发表于 2005-5-3 07:07:00 | 只看该作者
    偶想借这题问问做BF题目该用啥方法可以快点呢? 是先看一遍全文,然后对照答案呢? 还是就看这2句话然后看前后文字结合答案呢?
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 21:15
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部