ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1083|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-13-4-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-16 09:48:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-13-4-4


4.     The region’s water authority is responding to the current drought by restricting residential water use. Yet reservoir levels are now at the same height they were during the drought ten years ago when no restrictions were put into effect and none proved necessary. Therefore, imposing restriction now is clearly premature.


Which one of the following, if true, most seriously calls the conclusion above into question?


(A) There are now more water storage reservoirs in the region than there were ten years ago.


(B) The population of the region is approximately three times greater than it was ten years ago.


(C) The region currently has more sources outside the drought-stricken area from which to draw water than it did ten years ago.


(D) The water-consuming home appliances and fixtures sold today are designed to use water more efficiently than those sold ten years ago.(B)


(E) The price of water for residential use is significantly higher in the region than it is in regions that are not drought-stricken.


  认为a也是削弱呀。


沙发
发表于 2005-4-16 15:46:00 | 只看该作者

A obviously strengthens the simulus argument.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 18:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部