ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1984|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解真题52-section7-Q14与Q16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-4-10 00:08:00 | 只看该作者

求解真题52-section7-Q14与Q16

14. The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?
(A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizen participation ranging from 30 percent in some communities to 80 percent in others.
(B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20 percent of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.
(C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too small to permit cost-effective pickup and transportation.
(D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution.
(E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.


这题我选C, 可答案是B


16. A new technique for extracting residues of oil from existing oil wells by using lignins, a by-product of papermaking, is profitable provided that oil prices are over 20 dollars a barrel. Since oil prices are rising, investors looking for companies with prospects for rapid growth in profits would be wise to invest in paper manufacturers, whose currently almost worthless by-product will soon be a profit-boosting commodity.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) A small quantity of lignins are currently sold by paper manufacturers to chemical companies, but most of the lignins produced are burnt as waste.
(B) The 20-dollar-a-barrel oil price as a threshold of profitability for using lignins allows for the increased cost of refining crude oil that has been extracted using lignins.
(C) Only one-half to two-thirds of the total oil in a well can be extracted using conventional techniques of pumping and flooding with water.
(D) Petroleum-based substances that can be used as a substitute for lignins in extracting oil are costly and are made from oil, and these substances therefore increase in price as oil increases in price.
(E) The quantity of lignins produced annually in the manufacture of paper is several times larger than the amount that is likely to be useful in the oil industry.


偶选B, 答案是E, 不解,求助于NN们

沙发
发表于 2005-4-12 00:05:00 | 只看该作者

14.

Because the advise is " to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years". In this argument, the highlighted parts are 3 areas that could be flawed. Only B gives us the explanation of why "50 percent of all solid waste" is flawed, because 20% soil waste can match processed raw materials in quality and price. Beyond 20%, we don't know whether it'll be profitable, most probably, it won't be profit. The rest of the answers don't address any of the 3 possible flawed part. Thus, I think the answer should be B. C is wrong, because I think the question already told us that the recycling is profitable. C is the statement that just opposite to the fact that the question already gave us.


板凳
发表于 2005-4-12 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

16.

In this question, no specific flaws in the arguement that given. I think it's kind of an open end question  that as long as the choices can prove 1 flaw in the arguement, then that'll be the answer. Only E proves that "invest in paper manufacturers" is not feasible. Because current paper manufacturer can generate more than enough lignins for oil industry. Thus, if anyone invest in paper manufacture, he/she will lose money because lignin supply is over demand.

my 2 cent. open to discussion-----

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 04:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部