Prep08 B部分第81题答案解释的一个小瑕疵

豆腐店的86

潜水多年只因版上全是大神，小弟没有什么有价值的内容可以贡献。今天刷题发现有一题的答案解释有一些小瑕疵，虽然完全不影响解题，而且逻辑也毫无问题，但是既然有瑕疵，那我秉承“人人为我，我为人人”的态度，也还是应该指出来，方便大家更好的理解题目。

题目是这样的

Environmentalist: Snowmobiles in the park north of Milville createunacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville Business Spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners toMilville in the winter months, to the great direct financial benefit of many localresidents. In addition, the money the town collects in fees for the recreationaluse of the park indirectly benefits all Milville residents. So, it is basiceconomics for us to put up with the pollution.
Which of the following, if true, could best be used by the environmentalist to[size=12.000000pt]counter the business spokesperson’s argument?
                                       

A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noiseand pollution that snowmobiles generate.
(B)  Not all of the people who go snowmobiling in the vicinity of Milville are from outof town.
(C)  Snowmobiles, because they run on two-cycle engines, emit greater amounts ofhydrocarbons and particulate matter than cars do.
(D)  Industrial pollution in Milville has been significantly reduced in the past few years[size=12.000000pt]without any adverse effect on the town’s economy.
(E)  Many Milville residents object to having to pay fees for recreational use of thepark in the winte

答案是A毫无疑问，笔记解释如下：

A. Correct 很多跨国的滑雪者现在由于噪音和污染已经不再来由于污染可能影响到经济的发展,如果忽略污染问题的经济状况可能出现危险,所以本选项反驳了“经济利益可以让我们暂时忽略污染的问题”这个结论

解释的大逻辑框架完全是正确的，说白了就是阻碍了其他一部分人来滑雪进而降低了经济效益。
但是解释对于Cross-Country Skier的理解是不对的。这个短语特指穿双板雪橇滑野雪在山头树林间穿梭的那种滑雪者。 所以更精确的解释其实是因为满山的滑雪摩托车使得滑野雪的人根本不愿意来，进而降低了经济效益。

作为滑雪爱好者，看到这题开心秒选，虽然我是滑单板的，吼吼哈。



总之不影响解题，只是能理解的更精确我们何乐而不为。
祝大家考试顺利，也祝自己考试RP满满。