- UID
- 1140
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-3-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Kaplan RC
THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF READING COMPREHENSION 1.Be sensitive to issues of topic, scope, and author’s purpose and structure, and the author’s voice. What does GMAT reading involve? Broadly stated, it involves reading to identify three general elements: topic and scope, the author’s purpose and passage structure, and the author’s voice. And all of these elements will normally be clear from a strategic reading of the first paragraph alone.
Topic( a subject of discussion or conversation) and scope(the area covered by a given activity or subject.)
As you work through the first few sentences, you need to determine the passage’s topic. If it’s a science passage, for example, ask yourself what branch of science it’s about. If it’s about astronomy, ask yourself what part of astronomy. If it’s about stars, then zero in on the passage’s topic: stars. When it comes to determining the scope of a passage, you need to understand what we mean by scope. Think of scope as a narrowing of the topic. If the topic is industrial safety regulations, what narrower definition can we present that still describes all of the passage? Is there a comparison to another type of safety regulation? Is there a comparison between safety regulations in different historical eras? Is there an analysis of the regulations’ histories? Or is the passage concerned only with a small aspect of the regulations—the ones pertaining to pregnant workers, for example?
Notice the questions in the previous paragraph. They may not read well, but we left them that way for a reason. Those questions nicely illustrate the kind of thinking that you’ll need to do as you work through a passage on test day. Once you have the topic and narrowed down its scope, you’ve finished the first step in reading comprehension. But what then? You still don’t have a firm grasp of the passage.
Author’s purpose and structure
Almost every single GMAT reading comp question hinges on your ability to step back from the text and analyze why the author is writing in the first place and how she puts her text together. The GMAT demands that you figure out the author’s purpose and the passage structure, because that’s the best way for the test makers to test how you think about the prose you read. And thinking is always being tested, one way or another, on every GMAT question.
Now, it would be nice, not to mention helpful, if the authors of the reading passages came right out and announced why they are writing, what they have to say, and how they intend to accomplish their goal. No such luck. The prose that you will see on the GMAT, like most sophisticated writing, doesn’t reveal its secrets quite so explicitly. Authors always have a purpose, of course, and always have a structural plan for carrying out that purpose. What they don’t do is announce them, and that puts an extra burden on the reader—to analyze what’s stated, read between the lines, and make inferences.
Baldly laying out the why and how of a passage up front isn’t a hallmark of GMAT reading comp passages. And even more importantly, if ideas were blatantly laid out, the test makers couldn’t ask probing questions about them. So, in order to set up the questions—to test how we think about the prose we read—the GMAT uses passages in which authors hide or disguise their statement of purpose and challenge us to extract it. If you came across the following first sentence of a typical passage, could you identify the topic and scope?
|
|