求助

flair1107

Editorial:An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander's approval should no longer be required since the officers' time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

AThe first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.  

BThe first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

CThe first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.  

DThe first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.

EThe first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.  

为什么不能选D?

benjaminsandro

D选项后半句
the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
第二句是一个判断that被用来支持那个被挑战的position。

明白了么？

soy265

第一个黑体：不需要监督员
第二个黑体：（不需要监督员）这个建议很危险，因为如果没有监督员，人们可能会乱来，质量就不好了

作者是持第二个黑体的意见。需要监督员。

应该选B The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

D 不正确，challenged position指不需要监督员。第二条是against这个观点而不是support。

kluivert

D本身就有矛盾
DThe first is a position that the editorial challenges;  一个被editorial 所挑战的“position”。 the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position. 一个被用来支持那个“被挑战的position”的看法

editor/editorial 是挑战这样的立场-watch commander's approval should no longer be required  
而第二个是editor/editorial 的judgement... 不用看内容就知道是自相矛盾...又挑战，又支持的

而内容事实也是反对的 This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous 建议(是危险的)应该被拒绝