ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7290|回复: 18
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]天山-9-37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-29 01:03:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]天山-9-37

For many years, historians thought
that the development of capitalism had not
faced serious challenges in the United
Line States. Writing in the early twentieth cen-
(5) tury, Progressive historians sympathized
with the battles waged by farmers and
small producers against large capitalists
in the late nineteenth century, but they did
not question the widespread acceptance
(10) of laissez-faire (unregulated) capitalism
throughout American history. Similarly,
Louis Hartz, who sometimes disagreed
with the Progressives, argued that Americans
accepted laissez-faire capitalism
(15) without challenge because they lacked
a feudal, precapitalist past. Recently,
however, some scholars have argued
that even though laissez-faire became
the prevailing ethos in nineteen-century
(20) America, it was not accepted without
struggle. Laissez-faire capitalism, they
suggest, clashed with existing religious
and communitarian norms that imposed
moral constraints on acquisitiveness to
(25) protect the weak from the predatory, the
strong from corruption, and the entire culture
from materialist excess. Buttressed
by mercantilist notions that government
should be both regulator and promoter
(30) of economic activity, these norms persisted
long after the American Revolution
helped unleash the economic forces that
produced capitalism.
These scholars
argue that even in the late nineteenth
(35) century, with the government’s role in
the economy considerably diminished,
laissez-faire had not triumphed completely.
Hard times continued to revive
popular demands for regulating busi-
(40) ness and softening the harsh edges of
laissez-faire capitalism.


Q37: The passage suggests that the scholars mentioned in line 17 would agree with  which of the following statements regarding the "norms" mentioned in line 23?


A. They provided a primary source of opposition to the devlopment of laissez-fire capitalism in the United States in the nineteenth century.
B. Their appeal was undermined by diffcult economic times in the United States at the end of the nineteenth century.
C. They disappeared in the United States in the late nineteenth century because of the trinmph of laissez-faire captitalism.
D. They facilitated the successful implementation of mercantilist notions of government in the United States in the nineteenth-century.
E. They are now recognized by historians as having been an important part of the ideology of the American Revolution.


Answer: A,


My answer: D, as this is supported by bold line.

沙发
发表于 2005-3-29 08:15:00 | 只看该作者
Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism.
这句是说,在政府商业理念的支持下,这些(道德和社会)规范在十九世纪后期仍持续发挥作用,协助释放了资本主义的经济力量。而D选项的意思是,这些(道德和社会)规范使政府商业理念得以成功贯彻。
首先,这两者的意思方向基本相反。
而且,文章没有提及the successful implementation of mercantilist notions of government,反倒说the government’s role in the economy considerably diminished,意思也是基本相反。
板凳
发表于 2005-4-5 02:05:00 | 只看该作者

是不是用以下原文中的话更好理解A选项?

Laissez-faire capitalism, they
suggest, clashed with existing religious
and communitarian norms that imposed
moral constraints on acquisitiveness to
(25) protect the weak from the predatory, the
strong from corruption, and the entire culture
from materialist excess.

地板
发表于 2005-4-18 17:06:00 | 只看该作者
对的。。。
5#
发表于 2005-6-24 07:05:00 | 只看该作者

Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism.


这句话是不是有问题啊?我看也半天没有看出来helped后面是什么成分?我的理解Buttressed后面是状语,用来修饰主语these norms,persisted是谓语。helped直接单独放在这里应该是不行的,我想这里应该掉了一个关键的词。我能想到只有两种情况,helped前面少了一个and或者that。如果加个and的话,helped与persisted并列做谓语,语法上没有问题,但逻辑上不太通,前面已经讲了这些norms与laissez-faire capitalism有冲突,现在又讲这些norms帮助解放促进capitalism的经济力量,前后有些矛盾。如果加上that,helped后面用来修饰American Revolution,指是Revolution帮助解放了那些促进capitalism的经济力量,这样逻辑上列合理一些。


大家都觉得这个句子没有问题吗?怎么没有人提出来?有点怀疑是我自己没有想明白,请指教!!!

6#
发表于 2005-6-24 12:34:00 | 只看该作者

主句谓语是helped。persisted是修饰norms这个主句主语的。句意和语法都没有问题。

7#
发表于 2005-7-22 19:16:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得:主语是norms,谓语是persisted,后面的long after是状语从句,表示在美国独立战争帮助解放经济力量以产生资本主义之后很久,这些社会主义的norms还persisted.


Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted (long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism.)

8#
发表于 2005-7-23 01:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-7-22 19:16:00的发言:

我觉得:主语是norms,谓语是persisted,后面的long after是状语从句,表示在美国独立战争帮助解放经济力量以产生资本主义之后很久,这些社会主义的norms还persisted.


Buttressed by mercantilist notions that government should be both regulator and promoter of economic activity, these norms persisted (long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism.)



Buttressed by ...., these norms (that) persisted long after the American Revolution helped unleash the economic forces that produced capitalism.


觉得应该这样来理解句子。如果按照ring-cheng的理解,helped在句中做什么成份呢?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-23 1:00:46编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-9-22 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
helped做persisted 的宾语从句中的谓语
10#
发表于 2005-10-3 06:08:00 | 只看该作者

Could someone post the question 35 and the answer? I do not have it.


Thanks a lot!!!谢谢谢谢谢

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-18 12:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部