ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1079|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全 10-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-20 17:44:00 | 只看该作者

大全 10-11

11.   Less than 50 percent of a certain tropical country’s wildlands remains intact. Efforts are under way to restore biological diversity in that country by restoring some destroyed wild habitats and extending some relatively intact portions of forests. However, opponents argue that these efforts are not needed because there is still plenty of wildland left.


Which of the following, if true, most significantly weakens the argument of the opponents of conservation efforts?


(A) As much, if not more, effort is required to restore a wild habitat as to preserve an intact habitat.


(B) The opponents of restoration efforts are, for the most part, members of the wealthier classes in their own villages and cities.


(C) Existing conservation laws have been very effective in preserving biological diversity within the wildlands that remain intact.


(D) For many tropical species native to that country, the tropical wildlands that are still relatively intact do not provide appropriate habitats for reproduction.D


(E) If a suitable population of plants and animals is introduced and is permitted to disperse and grow, tropical habitats can most certainly be restored.    請問(A)是什麼意思?為什麼要選(D)?

沙发
发表于 2007-8-6 08:21:00 | 只看该作者
好不容易搜索到的讨论贴居然都是没有回复的.我也是在A和D之间犹豫,结果选了A的。虽然我承认D是有道理的,但是A为什么不对呢?或者说D比A好在哪里呢?
板凳
发表于 2007-8-6 11:36:00 | 只看该作者

我是这样想的:

A)恢复野外居住地所需要的努力与保护原始居住地所需要的努力一样多。

  并没有说到有没有必要保护这两种居住地,所以A不好。

D)“没有足够的居住地来繁衍”正好提供了一个理由要保护居住地,反对“反对者”。

  所以选D。

地板
发表于 2007-8-7 01:08:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks a lot. I agree with you.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 18:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部