ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7450|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急问gwd 9-33

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-2 11:32:00 | 只看该作者

急问gwd 9-33


GWD-9-Q33 to GWD-9-Q36:


Scientists studying the physiology


of dinosaurs have long debated whether


dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.


Line  Those who suspect they were warm-


(5)   blooded point out that dinosaur bone


is generally fibro-lamellar in nature;


because fibro-lamellar bone is formed


quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are


laid down haphazardly. Consistent with


(10)  their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded


animals, such as birds and mammals,


tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone,


whereas reptiles, which are slowgrowing


and cold-blooded, generally


(15)  produce bone in which fibrils are laid


down parallel to each other. Moreover,


like the bone of birds and mammals,


dinosaur bone tends to be highly


vascularized, or filled with blood


(20)  vessels. These characteristics,


first recognized in the 1930’s,


were documented in the 1960’s by


de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized,


fibro-lamellar bone in several


(25)  groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s,


Bakker cited these characteristics as


evidence for the warm-bloodedness of


dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged


caution, arguing for an intermediate type


(30)  of dinosaur physiology, a generation of


paleontologists has come to believe


that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.


In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s


contention began to be questioned, as a


(35)  number of scientists found growth rings


in the bones of various dinosaurs that


are much like those in modern reptiles.


Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in


nature, producing a series of concentric


(40)  rings in the bone, not unlike the growth


rings of a tree. Recently, Chinsamy


investigated the bones of two dinosaurs


from the early Jurassic period


(208-187 million years ago), and found


(45)  that these bones also had growth rings;


however, they were also partially fibrolamellar


in nature. Chinsamy’s work


raises a question central to the debate


over dinosaur physiology: did dino-


(50)  saurs form fibro-lamellar bone because


of an innately high metabolic rate associated


with warm-bloodedness or


because of periods of unusually fast


growth that occurred under favorable


(55)  environmental conditions? (Although


modern reptiles generally do not form


fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodiles


raised under optimal environmental


conditions do.) This question remains


(60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence


into account, one cannot make


a definitive statement about dinosaur


physiology on the basis of dinosaur


bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an


(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure


because their physiology was neither


typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.



GWD-9-Q33:


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged


by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was


A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès


B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers


C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time


D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists


E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy


Answer



但倾向A



我觉得D不好,错在warranted,见文中加亮部分


急请NN帮忙!

沙发
发表于 2005-3-2 14:28:00 | 只看该作者
Please read the the quiz one more time. I gues you got a misunderstanding regarding what was agreed upon: either the bone structure or the "caution" itself. That's it.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-3 10:00:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢斑竹,海不是很明白
地板
发表于 2005-3-4 10:17:00 | 只看该作者

I'm so sorry....

文章的作者最有可能认为de Ricqles所提醒的“小心”是:

A. 未被证明的

B. 没必要的

C. 对那时候的流行观点有指导作用的

D. 有道理的

E. 对于最新的工作有影响力的

The quiz asks for the attitude toward the "caution" urged by de Riqles...

5#
发表于 2005-3-10 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢斑竹

6#
发表于 2005-5-3 17:28:00 | 只看该作者
D项中的“given certain subsequent findings of other scientists”怎么解释呢,好像文中没有提到嘛
7#
发表于 2005-6-12 19:42:00 | 只看该作者

我也想问楼上的问题

8#
发表于 2005-6-13 18:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用BiteGmat在2005-5-3 17:28:00的发言:
D项中的“given certain subsequent findings of other scientists”怎么解释呢,好像文中没有提到嘛

意思是“鉴于其他科学家在此后的某些发现”。
Although de Ricqlès urged caution, arguing for an intermediate type of dinosaur physiology, a generation of paleontologists has come to believe that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.
In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s contention began to be questioned, as a number of scientists found growth rings in the bones of various dinosaurs that are much like those in modern reptiles.
Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in nature, producing a series of concentric rings in the bone, not unlike the growth rings of a tree.
Recently, Chinsamy
investigated the bones of two dinosaurs from the early Jurassic period (208-187 million years ago), and found that these bones also had growth rings; however, they were also partially fibrolamellar in nature.
Chinsamy’s work
raises a question central to the debate over dinosaur physiology: did dinosaurs form fibro-lamellar bone because of an innately high metabolic rate associated with warm-bloodedness or because of periods of unusually fast growth that occurred under favorable environmental conditions?
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-13 18:41:48编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-6-14 09:40:00 | 只看该作者

33题的正确答案应该是A


题目问的是作者本人对de Ricqlès的"Caution"的最可能的看法


A、按照de Ricqlès当时的证据是未经证实的


D、根据别的科学家后来的发现,是被证实的


虽然又发现了bone ring,但大家也只是怀疑dinosaurs可能有intermidiate structure,但作者特别都强调用了不确定的说法,如This question remains unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence into account, one cannot make a definitive statement about dinosaur
physiology on the basis of dinosaur bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an intermediate pattern of bone structure because their physiology was neither
typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.


因此D的warranted是不准确的


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-14 9:41:32编辑过]
10#
发表于 2005-6-18 12:12:00 | 只看该作者

D


作者认同的看法It may be that dinosaurs had an





(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure



because their physiology was neither



typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.



de Ricqlès的"Caution"


de Ricqlès urged




caution, arguing for an intermediate type



(30)  of dinosaur physiology


==============>


作者赞同 de Ricqlès

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-2 02:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部