Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
A argument没有拒绝这目标,拒绝的是先提出来的一种措施 B 没说这个目标不能实现,否定一个方案后来不是又提出来一个方案 C题目也没说这个目标能实现 要能实现也得用第二个方案,而后面质疑的是第一个方案,所以肯定错 D说提出一个目标,而且很多正在争论的策略就是为了实现这个目标。后面也是对的,假如仍能耕地,农民不会卖地。因为这,提出第二个方案使地保持可耕,那么也就不会被作为住宅用地 E第二句话没说这种情况应该改变啊 我码了好多字啊~~