1/27 一战上海 静下心来好好看书。人可以失败一次，但不能次次失败。

v19suffered

这几天在看Manhattan SC然后同步做OG，分析总结很占时间的说，有的题详究的时候还蛮纠结的。我还没定考试时间，等我觉得ready了我就报名去，我人在美国，考位不紧张。但是我必须1月考根据学校的规定.
加油！

20110102

To chenjasmine
恩恩~不用客气~有需要的就搬走好啦~我也是都在坛子上找的

To v19suffered
我也是为了赶上报名的末班车哈哈~有些学校2月1号截至.
我前两天在看sc也是很纠结呢。。看得特别慢。。不过现在稍微有点感觉了。。v噢。。其实我觉得划成分还蛮有效的。。你不如试试看。。

看到一个前辈的帖子~这个时间相对我的比较相似..再整理一下..(其实启发没有那么大..这个作为考前的安慰好了..)

3周

OG 12一本。
OG上的数学普遍偏简单，但是数学review那段还是看看比较好。
我是到了考前2周才正式开始模考。
第一次做prep, Q48总分640. 感觉数学跟OG很不一样。
连续模考了4次，用prep, 分别是640, 650, 640, 670. 数学基本不是49就是50， verbal呢一会儿是阅读狂错或者SC狂错。

到考试为止
GWD一共做了3套，prep4套，OG一部分，练了一些prep破解的数学。

考试当天，作文第一次真正的写。没有觉得有特别难，正常发挥。也没有觉得写了特别多的字。数学部分还是不是特简单，有些题要绕一绕。考试时候毕竟紧张，有些时候看着题没反应。也许那些题平时做都觉得很简单。不过这里大家数学都很牛，不会有我这样的问题。
verbal部分一开始过于认真，速度就没跟上。SC照样是凭感觉蒙的，逻辑和阅读很多都觉得没有彻底读懂。到最后3道题，只剩40秒，彻底来不及。乱点了两道，最后一道看了看了事。当时觉得数学应该还可以，verbal完蛋了。于是郁闷得后面的什么调查都没填。结果最后报分出来Q50V37. 看了好几遍才确定没看错。几天后受到awa 5.5.

20110102

今天是第一阶段的最后一天，嗯 小小总结下好了

这个阶段主要是打基础。。我不求速度也不求正确率。。慢悠悠的做~ 反正我这个人本来就慢半拍~

3个部分， 改错，逻辑和作文模板。

个人觉得自己最差的改错。。语法什么的反应还不大过来。。看到长句子就不想念。。
这个要继续加强吧

逻辑

稍稍做了点题，看懂题不成问题。感觉有的时候不一定答得对。
觉得还是要一个词一个词看。今天早上想到个词字字珠玑。这个词真好。

作文模板
大概就稍微整理了一下下。。还有要润色的地方很多。。词拉什么的都还要看。。打字速度也还要加快。。我的忙打还真不大行。。

比较幸运的事群上这两天都在讨论数学，呀 发现自己数学不会还是挺多的。。真好~提个醒儿~

大致看了下七宗罪，发现有几个部分还是可以再归纳合并的。
时间因果黑白类比方法
1时间 事物或者环境会不会随
2因果关系七宗罪分的挺细的 不适合我 还是看到cause要警惕下，或者看到最后的结论想想看这个结论是通过因果推出来的么。
如果有看看这个因果是不是被correlation混淆的，还有一个就是3correlation和证据不给力其实差不多。还有4黑白理论。

如果题目里有用到5类比的话一定要攻击它，基本上都能扯出点毛病。不能最为最最大目标，小目标凑个字数也是没问题的么。
例子很重要很重要，一定要举出例子
还有个就是如果题目有给到调查方法是时候看看有没有调查方法的运用，个人觉得这适用范围太小了，估计也不能最为主论点

最后最后最后，如果实在凑不到3个原因就说它6vague。。东西交待的不清啦。。细节没给拉。。我总觉得这个是无理取闹。。不过也是个办法。。

待会要出去。。先把模板贴一贴

The argument that___________________ omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument.
(备用，如果argument比较长的话)The author concludes in the argument that_________, and he/she also points that____________.
2The author believes that the cause of the________________ is the fact that __________, inferring that__________________. (有因果矛盾的时候给力)
This alone does not constitute a logical argument in favor of _____________, and it certainly does not provide support or proof the main argument.


Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of______________.
1
2
3
4
5
6
First(把这个一定要换了), the argument assumed that the cause of the problem is that ___________ are unknown or inaccurate. (调查方法不准确，证据给的不足)
In a week attempt to support its claim, the argument describes_____________; but if the cause of the problem______ is that________, ________ will not solve the________. (前提错误，其他可能，和给例子一样)
Finally, if_______, the problem of______ cannot be solved by______. (这个句子没啥水平)
The argument does not address what would happen in the event that___________(address这个词是不错，可是在这里已经出现了两次了，得换)
前提有问题：
The argument rests on the assumption that_________. However, it is not necessarily
Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive.
If it included the items discussed above instead of solely explaining__________, the argument would have been more through and convincing.


The argument that___________________ omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument.
The author concludes in the argument that_________, and he/she also points that____________.
The author believes that the cause of the________________ is the fact that __________, inferring that__________________. (有因果矛盾的时候给力)
This alone does not constitute a logical argument in favor of _____________, and it certainly does not provide support or proof the main argument.


Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of______________.
First(把这个一定要换了), the argument assumed that the cause of the problem is that ___________ are unknown or inaccurate. (调查方法不准确，证据给的不足)
In a week attempt to support its claim, the argument describes_____________; but if the cause of the problem______ is that________, ________ will not solve the________. (前提错误，其他可能，和给例子一样)
Finally, if_______, the problem of______ cannot be solved by______. (这个句子没啥水平)
The argument does not address what would happen in the event that___________(address这个词是不错，可是在这里已经出现了两次了，得换)
前提有问题：
The argument rests on the assumption that_________. However, it is not necessarily
Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive.
If it included the items discussed above instead of solely explaining__________, the argument would have been more through and convincing.

zxp123456

thank

forgivexinian

其实我觉得你一开始做语法正确率就在75%已经很好了。
我下周三就考了，可是语法正确率让我很郁闷><，我做语法题慢不下来啊该死，还不如CR 和RC 呢。。。l
而且我都有AWA裸奔的冲动了。。

20110102

To zxp123456
哈哈~觉得有用尽管抱去~

To forgivexinian
我觉得实在是差好远..最近很容易懈怠..容易被分心的事又很多..恩! 坚定信念~排出杂念!
下周三的话是..19号?  没事阿~这个周末好好好好看~

整理一下被称为宝典的小安阅读法..(我实在是搞不懂为什么原对话是英文的..看在小安老师的大名下..可能他/她只用英文和别人交流吧..或者这是练习作文的宝典..不过我每次看到"tell me more"/"tell me please"都想笑..感觉像"oh! I want to know you more"--- 深情地 哈哈哈 请允许我YY一下XD

继续YY..这个jun真的是一个感情非常丰富的人..一直以"oh, my god" "oh, I am confusing" 小安是个情场老手..不管jun在那边感叹什么..他自己管自己说！ 可见人格魅力！

jun同学是个短期记忆不好的同学。可是小安老师没有嫌弃他。
呀。有爱。
first, read again again and again, till you get a framework of rc.
Before practicing, try to think about those answers that you did wrong, and try to summarize something in common from them. Especially pay attention to what is "related" and what is "unrelated" --Information(choices) towards author's attitude. Do not easily judge.
Memorize the pattern, and try to practice. without practice, you can get nothing
first, catagorize all the rc questions, you should guarantee 100% right on "main idea" type.  
try to collect all detail questions(those with line number or key words), try to get these right answer back to the passage.
collect the "structure type", and promise youself you can do 90% right or higher-it is just easy like "main idea and attitude" thing


first, you can get suttle feelings about how to make a question
second, you can get info about how to prepare to do those questions when you are reading the passage
you will see when you finished summarizing, you can easily tell that " oh, i think ets will make a question in here" when you are reading the passage
1. why the author writh this para/作者态度2. what he want to tell us/这段话在这干嘛的3. is there any change in attitude/有变化么，和前文4. what is the function of the detail in this para/这些详细的数据-如果有的话， 用来干嘛的5. what may be the relation between this para and the whole passage 和前文啥关系。。和2差不多
-----〉 to know what part of passage i should read carefully when i read"
try to get all infer question collected, try to contrast the answer and the original text
try to get what is wrong about the wrong questions
do not stop on why they are all wrong when you can get some feeling like "too extreme"
you should catagorize on subject matter, the whole logic relation between facts and stuffs
Anchoret says:
memorize the "either lead to or restrain" relationships between things
you will confused if you do not memorize or memorize too much

that is enough for quickly ruling out most confusing wrong answers without relocating

文科 passages, pay more attension on 列举
economic and management passages, pay more attention to the logic推理顺序and support/unsupport relationship


Anchoret says:
1. try to directly get all the answers from passage because you are famaliar with the passages. Do not see the questions
Anchoret says:
try to get what may be a question here
jun says:
you are expert on GMAT
Anchoret says:
2. when you finished reading, try to write the frame in chinese (or english) in a paper. it is quite like to write down jijing.
to know what you have forgotten and the capacity of your memorization.
every para, five questions and what may be the key point for questions and finally you will improve on the ability to memorize more of the passage framework
the more and the clear you can memorize the frame of the passage, the less time you have to spend on questions
practice more passages in one day on the second round.the more you can get in one day, the stronger you feel about rc
three days for all og passages.

20110102

今天的argument:

题目
Reasearch indicates that those who exercise regualrly are hospitalized less than half as often as those who dont exercise. By providing a well-equiped gym for Saluda's municipal employees, we should be able to reduce the cost of our group health insurance coverage by approximately 50% and thereby achieve balanced town budget.

因果 有 多锻炼-〉少生病（只能算是有关系） people are well educated, they take care of themselves. They took vitamin or open shelf medication instead going to hospital
researh is too vague, not really believable --did not see because the location is different. People
很多其他方面可以减少budget- increase tax rate, or cut other cost
insurance cannot be reduced 50%

In this argument, the author concludes that building a wellequiped gym will reduce Saluda's municipal emloyees' health cost, and he/she alsopoints that this reduce will balanced Saluda's town budget. The athor believes that the cause of the reducing health cost is the fact that people who exercise more hospitalized less inferring that they will need less coverage of health insurance. The argument omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument.

Most conspicuously, the argument assumes that the cause of people go to hospital less frequently is exercising on a regular basis.  This cause-and effect relationship is unproved and the reason for less visiting to hospital might have nothing to do exercising.  For instance, common awareness of open-shelf medication use might be growing more slowly than anticipated. For that matter, when people get sick they can quickly find the right medication to heal the sickness. Or they can take pills inadvance before any symptons appear. Without ruling out these and other alternative explanation for the low hospital visits, the author cannot reasonably conclude that people exercise more will have any effect on health.

Secondly, the research the author relied on was too vague and he/she provides no evidence to support the claim that the people from Saluda will experience the same result.  it is insufficient to warrant the research's truth because there is no reason to believe that data drawn from general is representative of the sepeacific place. For example, if the region from which the data was gathered was Florida, it would clearly be unrepresentative. The reason for this is obvious. Florida is populated by a disproportionate number of retired people over 65 years old and is a very popular vacation destination during the winter months. Moreover, resort hotel occupancy in Florida typically declines significantly during the summer months.



Finally, the argument assumed that government can reduce the cost of  health insurance  by approximately 50% is inaccurate.
However, it is not necessarily Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive.
If it included the items discussed above instead of solely explaining the time people visiting hospital. the argument would have been more through and convincing. The author fails to account for the other possible concern within health insurance, such as buying medications and having access to health care websites.

To summarize, the argument is unconvincing as it stands. If the author wants to strengthen the conclusion, he or she must provide evidence that people in Saluda area less likely become sick because of regular exercises.  To better evaluate the argument, the author should also provide evidence where he/she got the research and if Saluda shares enough similarities with the original.

20110102

1/14
昨天晚上做了个阅读..发现不给力啊..以为阅读是自己最好的部分..结果6道里错一半..这个..让我情何以堪..

修改下昨天写的argument

In this argument, the author concludes that building a well-equipped gym will reduce municipals' health cost, and he/she also points that this reduce will balanced town's budget. The author believes that the cause of this action is the fact that the time continually exercised people visit hospitals are less than half of those who do not, inferring that continually exercised people will need less coverage of health insurance. However, the argument omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument.



First and most conspicuously, the argument assumes that the cause of people go to hospital less frequently is exercising on a regular basis.This cause-and effect relationship is unproved and the reason for less hospital visiting to might have nothing to do with exercising. For instance, awareness of using open-shelf medication might be more common. For that matter, when people get sick they choose to get medication care themselves rather than go to hospitals. Or some of them can take pills in advance before any symptom appears. Without ruling out these and other alternative explanation for the low hospital visits, the author cannot simply conclude that exercising more will have any effect on people’s health.



Secondly, the research that the author relied on was too vague and he/she provides no evidence to support the claim that people from Saluda will experience the same result as the research. It is insufficient to warrant the research's result because there is no reason to believe that data drawn from it is representative of any specific place, such as Saluda
. For example, if the region from which the data was gathered was Florida, it would clearly be unrepresentative. The reason for this is obvious. Florida is populated by a disproportionate number of retired people over 65 years old and is a very popular vacation destination during the winter months. Those people do not really need health care because senior citizens have their own day cares and travelers prefer to go to their local hospital.


Finally, the number that the government can reduce the cost of health insurance by approximately 50% is reasonable doubted inaccurate. This prediction is solely based on the half less hospital visiting last from research. However, the author fails to account for the other possible concern within health insurance, such as covering medications cost and having access to some health care websites. If it included the items discussed above instead of solely judge on the times to hospital, the argument would have been more through and convincing.



To summarize, the argument is unconvincing as it stands. If the author wants to strengthen the conclusion, he or she must provide evidence of the reliable of the research. To better evaluate the argument, the author should also provide evidence if Saluda shares enough similarities with the original location that collected research data.

20110102

首先 这两天从G生活中逃脱两天

这是非常非常不应该 并且受到无数人谴责的。包括我自己。。

首先 昨天为了去看DAVID TAO的演唱会。。一天都没怎么看书。。
早上在图书馆掐时间作了练习。。死得非常惨烈

VERBAL 里面
SC 速度还行 1。35 分钟一道。。可是错误率太吓人了 40%。。我到底在做什么啊
CR 时间花得非常非常久 2。7分钟一道 正确率一般80%

这两天一定一定要闭门读书。。在家哪儿都不去了。。这个是关系到自己未来的事情。。

发现自己做题时候的一些小毛病
一。是看过了一句话就是眼睛扫过 没往脑子里去 更别说分析什么句子成分啊 在文章中的关系了
解决方法：专心专心专心/看每一句的时候稍稍想想前面句讲什么。。然后给个关系。。这和你在大街上看到一个人衣服然后脑子里迅速反应这个衣服不错。。其实你就是做一个比较的过程
二。没法子专心
解决方法： 这个有内因也有外因。内因占大部分。你要逼者着自己专心。实在不行就用鼠标点。眼睛跟着一个一个扫。这样的确慢，但至少你全神贯注。
外因。你就不能找个安静的地方学习么？你就不能把外边乱七八糟的干扰给降到最低么？家里不是挺好的。

研究CR如何做题的。解题步骤
一．看问题
问题分为：
1。下文推测MUST BE TRUE（包括SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING）
看原文：共同结合点的，将其结合起来，看能推出什麽。如果没有结合点，记住信息。对原文有充分必要推理有的，找推理起点（或在原文，或在问题，或在选项），由起点列出推理链。用该推理链选项找答案。常考NUMBERS AND PERCENTAGES和充分必要。
答案：是原文某句话的重写或逆否命题或某几句话的结合，特别是原文有充分必要推理的。特别注意数量上和可能性上的词的差别
TEST：FACT TEST。即选项的内容全部来之原文。
2。中心MIAN POINT（包括FILL IN BLANK）/POINT AT ISSUE/PRINCIPLE
看原文：找出主结论
答案：原文主结论的重写。必须概括全文并且是MUST BE TRUE。
TEST：原文找结论时，对没有指示词的，假设某个为结论，看看是其他句子是它的前提，直到找到主结论。
3。反对WEAKEN/FLAW IN THE REASONING/CANNOT BE TRUE
WEAKEN
看原文：找出结论和推出该结论的前提。特别注意结论的特殊性和具体性。
找答案：用结论的具体性去区分有关无关，并结合TEST。对于特殊类，先预测出答案，用此预测去找答案
TEST：问自己，是否该答案使作者再考虑他的观点或迫使作者做出反应或原文该前提能证明该结论吗。
几种特殊类型：
原文前提和结论关系不密切：正确选项直接WEAKEN结论
因果型结论：即原文给出两件事，然后得出结论说是一件事（因）导致另一件事（果）。WEAKEN该结论的方法包括：A。是其他原因或可能导致该结果。B。割断因果：或有因无果或有果无因。C。因果颠倒了。D显示因果关系的资料不准确。
条件型结论：结论带条件（即为充分必要）。WEAKEN的方法显示充分条件成立，必要条件可以不成立。或举反例，或提供有关信息。
原文是类比：WEAKEN方式为两者本质不同
调查：有效性受怀疑（被调查的没代表性等）
4。支持SUPPORT/PARALLEL REASONING
5。评论JUSTIFY THE CONCLUSION/EVALUATION THE ARGUMENT
6。假设ASSUMPTION
7。表态RESOLVE THE PARADOX
8。方法METHOD OF REASONING（包括ROLE）

二。分析原文
1．原文有结论：分清前提，反前提，附加前提，中间结论和总结论，特别是推出结论的直接前提。在脑中形成因为（直接前提）所以（结论）推理结构。注意结论的特殊性和具体性
2．原文没结论的：主要有三类MUST BE TRUE/CANNOT BE TRUE/RESOLVE THE DESCREPANCY。对前两类，有共同结合点的，将其结合起来，看能推出什麽。如果没有结合点，记住信息。对于第三类，记住矛盾

三．排除选项或找出答案
1．如果有些问题类型和原文特点结合产生能预测答案的，则直奔答案，
2．如果如果只能预测答案大体情况，则结合有关无关排除选项
3．剩下的用有关无关，排除选项，剩下有关的。各类题有关无关概念不完全相同，但总体上是和谈论的话题有关就是有关。再用各类体的TEST去最后确认或从混淆的最后一两个答案中找出正确答案。
4．至此多数题能找到答案。有四类特殊的题型可用TEST去检验所选的是否正确或在剩下的几个混淆项中选出正确答案。分别是Assumption-Negation Justify-Justify FormulaEvaluate-Variance TestPoint at Issue-Disagree/Agree 没懂
四．几种特殊题型
CONDITIONAL CONCLUSION/CONDITIONAL REASONING/CAUSE AND EFFECT CONCLUSION/NUMBERSAND PERCENTAGES（两者没必然关系，不能混淆）/FORMAL LOGIC（有指示词SOME， ALL， NONE， MOST是SUBJECT之间的包容关系，用画圈圈法解）
五．各类题


4．SUPPORT

看原文即找答案：同WEAKEN
TEST：问自己，选项是否在某方面帮助了作者
几种特殊类型
原文前提和结论关系不密切：正确选项直接支持结论
因果型结论：即原文给出两件事，然后得出结论说是一件事（因）导致另一件事（果）。SOPPORT该结论的方法包括：A。没有其他原因或可能导致该结果。B。结合因果：或有因有果或无果无因。C。因果不颠倒了。D显示因果关系的资料是准确。
原文是类比：SUPPORT方式为两者本质相同
调查：有效性不受怀疑（被调查的有代表性等）
假设类支持：将原文的推理中的GAP填补。消除原文的推理缺陷。因果型结论。条件型结论常以假设的形式出现
5．ASSUMPTION
看原文：同WEAKEN。对于充分必要的，列出推理链。
找答案：答案分两类型：SUPPORT（填补推理上的概念GAP），DEFENDER（排除WEAKEN结论的可能性，即排除他因）。读原文，推理中有概念GAP（特别是答案出现新元素），则答案填补这个GAP（通常新元素必出现），否则找他因，排除推理中的WEAKNESS。最后用TEST检验或排除易混的答案。对于后一类用有关无关有时比较好，用结论的具体性和特殊性去分有关无关，排出剩下的用TEST
DENIAL TEST：将选项取非，原文结论不成立，则为正确选项。
几种特殊类型：
因果型结论：ASSUMPTION的方法包括：A。不是其他原因或可能导致该结果。B。结合因果：或有因有果或无果无因。C。因果没颠倒。D显示因果关系的资料是准确。
条件型结论：结论带条件（即为充分必要）。ASSUMPTION的方法排除充分条件出现，必要条件不出现的情况。或充分条件一定能推出必要条件，或排除充分条件推不出必要条件的可能
原文是类比：ASSUMPTION方式为两者本质不是不同
调查：肯定有效性（被调查的对象有代表性等）
6．JUSTIFY THE CONCLUSIONH
看原文：因为需要100 CERTAINTY，故原文类型多为充分必要类或NUMBERS AND PERCENTAGES。画出推理链或找出结论的新元素
找答案：用原文结论出现的新元素或推理链或NUMBERS ADNPERCENTAGES的计算结果去找答案，再结合TEST排除充分必要颠倒的混淆选项。
TEST：PREMISE + ANSWER CHOICE = CONCLUSION
7。RESOLVE THE PARADOX
看原文：找出原文的矛盾或奇怪的现象
找答案：用相关无关排除答案，和具体的矛盾的事有关无关，结合TEST。
TEST：答案必须使原文相矛盾的事物不矛盾或都是真，都成立
8．METHOD OF REASONING（包括ROLE）
看原文：找出原文的推理结构
找答案：用排除法。排除出现原文没说过的东西的选项，包括新元素，极端化或夸张的元素，相反的元素，颠倒的元素。结合TEST
TEST：选项描述了原文的结构，每个元素都必须在原文出现过。
ROLE：分析原文的结构即某句话在原文的作用，和答案对。原文结构元素包括前提，反前提，附加前提，副结论，主结论。对于两个结论的段子，很多主结论在第一句话，副结论（SUBSIDARY， SECONDATY，INTERMEDIATE，SUPPORTING CONCLUSION）在结尾并有指示词
9．FLAW IN THE REASONING
看原文：找出原文错误
找答案：描述原文错误的为答案。描述的因素原文没有的为错误答案
TEST：描述原文的推理错误，每个元素都必须在原文出现过。
10．PARALLEL REASONING
看原文：找出原文推理形式（因果推理，充分必要，类比，循环论证等），结论和前提的特点（CERTAINTY LEVEL），推理有效性（问题说有推理缺陷的，选项也应有相应的推理缺陷，没说则没有推理缺陷）
找答案：将上面四个因素和答案MATCH（绝对配绝对，意见配意见，条件配条件，MUST，COULD，MANY，SOME，NEVER配相应词）
11．EVALUATION THE ARGUMENT
看原文：同WEAKEN。
找答案：用结论的具体性去区分有关无关，并结合TEST
TEST：VARIANCE TEST。对答案的相反的回答能对原文结论起WEAKEN和SUPPORT作用
12．CANNOT BE TRUE
看原文：同MUST BE TRUE。共同结合点的，将其结合起来，看能推出什麽。如果没有结合点，记住信息。对原文有充分必要推理有的，找推理起点（或在原文，或在问题，或在选项），由起点列出推理链。用该推理链选项找答案。常考NUMBERS AND PERCENTAGES和充分必要。
找答案：和原文的某句话或某几句话的结合相矛盾。特别注意数量上和可能性上的词的差别。
TEST：FACT TEST。即选项的内容全部和原文矛盾。存在原文没提的元素的选项错。
13．POINT AT ISSUE
看原文：找出说话的人的结论和前提，特别是结论，多数不同的是观点，少数是前提。
找答案：用其中一个结论作为有关无关排除必错选项，再用另一个结论找出最综答案。对于说话人的结论是MORA或ETHICAL，则关于FACTUAL SITUATION的答案必错，反之亦然。结合TEST
TEST：AGREE/DISAGREE。其中一个人说“I AGREE，THE STATEMENT IS CORRECT”，另一个人必说“I DISAGREE，THE STATEMENT IS INCORRECT”。
14．PRINCIPLE
看问题：原则在原文还是选项
看原文：如果原则在原文，找出原则的条件。如果原则在选项，找出结论和推出结论的直接前提。
找答案：对于原则在原文的，将条件和选项直接比，符合条件的为答案。对于原则在选项的将推出结论的前提和结论和选项比，看是否在选项原则之内。

20110102

今天在自己总结SC错的部分..发现人还是要踏踏实实地来..前3后3方法的确快,可是不适合我..
第一看不懂题目了 二很多潜在错误在之前不会犯的都有了.比如说主语一致 指代对不对啊

我还是联系自己划成分的本事比较好..