ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1199|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13DT逻辑25,理解和OG解释不同,帮我看看问题所在

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-29 18:27:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, a tiger beetle will intermittently stop and then, a moment later, resume its attack. Perhaps the beetles cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running, tiger beetles are unable to adequately process the resulting rapidly changing visual information and so quickly go blind and stop.

 Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
B.In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running and its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.

假设1 BETTLE不能够保持快的速度,需要休息
假设2 BETTLES 无法处理总是在变换的视觉信息 瞎了
B是正选
我对B的理解是 当BETTLES在追一个改变方向的昆虫的时候,B能够改变方向,停的次数也会更多。
能够改变方向证明没瞎,驳2。停的次数多证明不能保持快速,支持1
但是OG的解释是这个论点 provide information that strengthens the second hypothesis.the swerving pursuit and resulting continual adjustments appear to be forcing the bettle to stop with increasing frequency to sort out the erratic visual information.这里是支持2的
为什么了 请人解释,谢谢了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-12-2 10:49:07 | 只看该作者
坐等大神解释啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 11:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部