求助一道逻辑题---为什么A不能作为正确答案

gui59106375

2. I agree that Hogan’s actions resulted in grievous
injury to Winters. And I do not deny that Hogan fully
realized the nature of his actions and the effects that
they would have. Indeed, I would not disagree if you
pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is
reprehensible, other things being equal. But in
asking you to concur with me that Hogan’s actions
not be wholly condemned I emphasize again that
Hogan mistakenly believed Winters to be the robber
who had been terrorizing west-side apartment
buildings for the past several months.
Which one of the following most accurately
expresses the conclusion of the argument?
(A) Hogan should not be considered responsible for
the injuries sustained by Winters.
(B) The robber who had been terrorizing west-side
apartment buildings should be considered to
be as responsible for Winters’s injuries as
Hogan.
(C) The actions of Hogan that seriously injured
Winters are not completely blameworthy.
(D) Hogan thought that Winters was the person who
had been terrorizing west-side apartment
buildings for the last few months.
(E) The actions of Hogan that seriously injured
Winters were reprehensible, other things
being equal.
正确答案是C，但是不理解A哪里错了

pinkking

楼主看这句

I would not disagree if you
pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is
reprehensible, other things being equal

gui59106375

楼主看这句

I would not disagree if you
pointed out that intentionally causing such effects is
reprehensible, other things being equal

-- by 会员 pinkking (2012/8/13 4:12:41)

我能否理解为A项是完全不用负责，C项是不用负全责