ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1199|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep07的一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-9 09:50:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
59. (34753-!-item-!-188;#058&007583)


A certain mayor has proposed a feeof five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming thatthe fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion.  The mayor reasons that, since the fee willexceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many peoplewill switch from using their cars to using the bus.


Which of the following statements,if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?


(A) Projected increases in theprice of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into thecity.

(B) The cost of parking feesalready makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a privatevehicle into the city than to take a bus.

(C) Most of the people currentlyriding the bus do not own private vehicles.

(D) Many commuters opposing themayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure traffic congestionthan pay a five-dollar-per day fee.

(E) During the average workday,private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city accountfor twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.



我知道B 是对的,但是为什么A不对啊!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-8-9 22:27:31 | 只看该作者
問的點是  5美元的費用可以使人們不做家用車,轉而坐公交車進城。   問其中的邏輯錯誤

A    如今的油價的上漲使 家用車進城的成本升高

沒關係啊 起碼跟bus 沒有關係, 油費貴了你可以騎自行車咯。 總之不是問題的點

B 講了 家用車和bus 的關聯
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 18:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部