本人愚笨 求助各位大侠

lishb07

42. Leaders of a miners' union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract proposal. The union leaders are considering as heir principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations, which are owned by Energy Incorporated, the same corporation that owns Coalco.

The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the union leaders' consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?


(A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?

(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?

(C) Have other miners' unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this union?

(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals with it?

(E) [Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?
这道题的答案是E 肯定各位NN分析下，题干的内容结构以及为什么选E？

chasingM7

Conclusion (in the question): union leaders' consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal

Question is: which answer choice is irrelevant to the above.

Premises: 1) additional measure to pressure company to accept union's proposal
               2) new tactic to boycott Gasco, which is owned by Energy Inc, which owns Coalco.
                   Coalco 和 Gasco同是Energy的子公司。

想通过boycott另一个子公司的方法，让母公司就范。满足union自己子公司的提案。

A)如果Gasco的收入损失严重影响Energy。 那energy肯定服软。
B)如果Gasco的客户可以在其他地方加油，那么Energy肯定服软。
C)如果有成功先例，就说明有成功可能性。
D)如果有成功先例，就说明有成功可能性。
E)没关系。没有说明对于Energy的影响。

希望有帮助！

lishb07

谢谢楼上 之前确实没把题目看懂

ssxxtt27

Conclusion (in the question): union leaders' consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal

Question is: which answer choice is irrelevant to the above.

Premises: 1) additional measure to pressure company to accept union's proposal
               2) new tactic to boycott Gasco, which is owned by Energy Inc, which owns Coalco.
                   Coalco 和 Gasco同是Energy的子公司。

想通过boycott另一个子公司的方法，让母公司就范。满足union自己子公司的提案。

A)如果Gasco的收入损失严重影响Energy。 那energy肯定服软。
B)如果Gasco的客户可以在其他地方加油，那么Energy肯定服软。
C)如果有成功先例，就说明有成功可能性。
D)如果有成功先例，就说明有成功可能性。
E)没关系。没有说明对于Energy的影响。

希望有帮助！

-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/8/2 19:14:19)

对ABCD没有异议
E选项，我有疑问。其它公司是否拥有gas station  如果没有的话，那么boycott不会奏效啊，因为只有他家有gas station 再怎么抵制也无法撼动其垄断地位啊。。。反之，如果有的话，那么the boycott of Gacco会奏效。所以我觉得E也有道理啊！求解答

ssxxtt27

顶~