OG 逻辑 4 求助 谢谢

lishb07

4. The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a pricing method called "historical costing." [c1]Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year's contractual（合同的） price.

Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically sound pricing method for military contracts[c2]?

(A) The government might continue to pay[c3] for past inefficient use of funds.A

(8) The rate of inflation has varied considerably[c4] over the past twenty years.

(C) The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials [c5]used for the products.

(D) Many taxpayers question[c6] the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.

(E) The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative weapons.[c7]



答案是A  实在弄不懂 ，求教各位大神[

wycg

A大概是讲了.之前的cost modal是inefficient.所以就根本上削弱了historical costing赖以存在的基础.
OG里面如果有解释的话,你要仔细看看.

Daisy775885

不知lz是否选的是B, 我第一眼看到就选的B.
我想这道题可以这么理解： 这个理论是否不好可从两方面考虑，1）是否伤害政府（买房）2）是否伤害卖方
B中随着inflation变话给钱，实际是对卖方有好处的
A中则显示出了对政府方面的不利因素：第一次pay多了往后还得pay的更多