ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2063|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

陈向东逻辑-解释题,求助NN!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-10 16:07:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Much of the best scientific research of today shows that many of the results of earlier scientific work that was regarded in its time as good as are in fact mistaken. Yet despite the fact that scientists are above all concerned to discover the truth, it is valuable for today’s scientists to study firsthand accounts of earlier scientific work.

Which of the following, if true, would best reconcile the two statements above?

A.Many firsthand accounts of earlier, flawed scientific work are not generally known to be mistaken.
B.Lessons in scientific methodology can be learned by seeing how earlier scientific work was carried out, sometimes especially when we results of that work are known to be incorrect.
C.Scientists can make valuable contributions to the scientific work of their time even if the results of their work will later be shown to be mistaken.
D.There are many scientists today who are not thoroughly familiar with earlier scientific research.
E.Some of the better scientific research of today does not directly address earlier scientific work.


答案是B。当然我后来是认同B的。
但是C错在哪里呢,每个时期的科学家在当时科学技术水平允许的情况下,做出的结论在他们那个年代是对的,科学的进步本来就是这样的过程:一开始是对的,正确的理论,不断被后继的推翻再重新定论。所以还是有贡献的嘛~
我这样的了解不对吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-10 16:32:21 | 只看该作者
求助求助啊~~~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-10 17:25:20 | 只看该作者
NN们,来帮帮我吧~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-10 19:11:23 | 只看该作者
is there anyone who can help me?
5#
发表于 2011-7-10 20:23:20 | 只看该作者
C is wrong because those scientists mentioned did not make "contributions to the scientific work of their time." Rather their contribution was in OUR time, or later than their time.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-10 21:02:02 | 只看该作者
谢谢,你的解释一针见血。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 19:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部