ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2163|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD TN 2 里一个CR 请高人指点

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-2 08:15:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD3-Q16:

Economist:Tropicorp, which constantly seeks profitable investment opportunities, has been buying and clearing sections of tropical forest for cattle ranching, although pastures newly created there become useless for grazing after just a few years.The company has not gone into rubber tapping, even though greater profits can be made from rubber tapping, which leaves the forest intact.Thus, some environmentalists conclude that Tropicorp has not acted wholly out of economic self-interest.However, these environmentalists are probably wrong.The initial investment required for a successful rubber-tapping operation is larger than that needed for a cattle ranch.Furthermore, there is a shortage of workers employable in rubber-tapping operations, and finally, taxes are higher on profits from rubber tapping than on profits from cattle ranching.

In the economist’s argument, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.The first supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.

B.The first states the conclusion of the economist’s argument; the second supports that conclusion.

C.The first supports the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states that conclusion.

D.The first states the environmentalists’ conclusion; the second states the conclusion of the economist’s argument.

E.Each supports the conclusion of the economist’s argument.

第2句话明显和结论相反,为何
  归为 结论方的论据呢?

答案为E
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-2 09:36:59 | 只看该作者
哎呀,误导你了....不好意思...
板凳
发表于 2010-7-2 10:19:52 | 只看该作者
这题就选c,童鞋看错答案了吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-15 06:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部