ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1389|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-5-20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-31 07:42:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
For a local government to ourlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.


The statement above best support which of the following conclusions?


(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.


(B) Where strikes by all categories of public-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.


(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-sector workers where it is the only available means of setting labor disputes with such workers.


(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.


(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.


这题正确答案是C,我选的是E,想不太明白,还请各位指点。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 13:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部