ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1573|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这个GWD也觉的好拗,请高手指点!谢谢!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-28 20:19:00 | 只看该作者

这个GWD也觉的好拗,请高手指点!谢谢!

In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent.  In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent.  The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

 

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?

 

  1. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.
  2. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a smaller tax increase.
  3. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.
  4. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.
  5. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.

答案选A

沙发
发表于 2007-1-28 22:17:00 | 只看该作者
结论成立必须假设香烟价格的增长只与税有关,而非厂家涨价等因素,所以选A
板凳
发表于 2007-1-29 12:48:00 | 只看该作者

I think the answer should be D instead


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-29 13:13:55编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-29 19:07:00 | 只看该作者
为什么选D呀 指点迷津啊!
5#
发表于 2007-1-29 23:43:00 | 只看该作者
A..should have no question on this..
6#
发表于 2007-1-30 13:56:00 | 只看该作者

pretax price + tax = after tax price

premise:  tax
        
increased 8 percent, sales decreased sharply

               tax not increased , sales decreased one percent

Conclusion:  after tax price is stronly related to sales

actually, we can only infer from premise that tax
                    
is related to sales, but the conclusion said after tax price is stronly related to sales.

To identify after tax price caused sales decreased, we must assume pretax price has no impact on sales. then pretax price should be <= previous year

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-30 19:36:00 | 只看该作者
真是太透彻了! 明白了 非常感谢!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-26 11:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部