ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 20091|回复: 74
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【阅读】11/02起悦嘟寂静整理(11/10更新,47篇原始,43篇考古)

[精华]   [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-11-2 14:52:14 来自手机 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
目录
一、 【考古】chicken
二、 【考古】agent theory
三、 【考古】upstream
四、 【考古】南方黑人
五、 【考古】植物与河
六、 【考古】法国大革命
七、 【考古】水泥
八、 【考古】Nitrogen
九、 【考古】失业率和通货膨胀率
十、 【暂无考古】Nursing
十一、            【少考古】Software                                【新增原始】
十二、            【考古】Laser
十三、            【考古】Focus group
十四、            【考古】Drought
十五、            【暂无考古】S type
十六、            【考古】Brand
十七、            【考古】Supernova
十八、            【考古】美国妇女重新就业
十九、            【考古】美国health care
二十、            【考古】蚂蚁milkweed
二十一、      【新增考古】四个经济指标    【新增考古】
二十二、      【考古】Predatory pricing
二十三、      【考古】Benchmark
二十四、      【暂无考古】Innovation
二十五、      【考古】蓝宝石
二十六、      【考古】古人类研究
二十七、      【考古】Ozone
二十八、      【考古】广告价格和弹性
二十九、      【考古】早期作品
三十、            【考古】Mantle
三十一、      【考古】爱尔兰女性权利
三十二、      【考古】green revolution
三十三、      【考古】支票
三十四、      【考古】基因
三十五、      【考古】N民族灭亡
三十六、      【考古】森林火灾
三十七、      【考古】期货房地产
三十八、      【考古】Online resume
三十九、      【考古】海水温度
四十、            【考古】机器人
四十一、      【考古】盐
四十二、      【考古】瓦特蒸汽机
四十三、      【考古】Wage gap
四十四、      【考古】Merger
四十五、      【考古】RNA
四十六、      【考古】CEO和compensation
四十七、      【暂无考古】美国法律

--------------
2018/11/02起寂静整理汇总:
【原始汇总】11/02起原始寂静汇总 by Cinderella灰
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331066-1-1.html
【数学】11/02起数学寂静原始稿 by qv0518
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331060-1-1.html
【数学讨论稿1-100】2018/11/02起数学讨论稿 by BurgerQueen
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331063-1-1.html
【数学讨论稿101-200】2018/11/02起数学讨论稿 by XY蓿安
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331070-1-1.html
【阅读】11/02起阅读静整理 by huajiananhai
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331080-1-1.html
【逻辑】11/02起逻辑寂静整理 by Lizavetta929
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331098-1-1.html
【语法】11/02起语法寂静整理稿 by AthenaF
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331064-1-1.html
【IR】11/02起IR寂静整理 by Super鳄鱼杭
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331117-1-1.html
【作文】11/02起坐稳寂静整理 by qv0518
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1331061-1-1.html

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
收藏收藏24 收藏收藏24
沙发
发表于 2018-11-2 15:39:45 | 只看该作者
JOURNAL ARTICLE
If Not for Plants, Could Rivers Bend? Geologists strengthen the case that early rooted plants engineered the look of modern rivers
Catherine Clabby
American Scientist
Vol. 98, No. 3 (May-June 2010), pp. 200-201
Published by: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27859504
Page Count: 2

For decades, the Canadian geologist Martin Gibling has been intrigued by the tough-to-prove hypothesis that land plants created the shape of modern rivers hundreds of millions of years ago.

Plant roots reinforced the ground, the thinking goes, creating stable banks that funneled what once were wide, shallow water flows into narrower and deeper channels. By extension, that set the stage for lots of significant Earth history events, including the rise of human civilizations in modern river basins so many millennia later.

Now Gibling and postdoctoral scientist Neil Davies, both at Dalhousie University, have strengthened this case. When the pair compared a much-improved plant fossil record with evidence of how rivers changed very long ago, the transitions matched up.

”As soon as the plants got a foothold on land and rooted vegetation started, that changed the landscape. Basically plants engineered that landscape as they evolved,” says Davies. He and Gibling have published the findings in both Geology and Earth-Science Reviews.
第二段:有个科学家的研究加强了这个理论。在一些5 million 以前的化石中找到了植物改变河道的证据。

Back in the Cambrian period, which ended some 500 million years ago, the geologic record indicates that rivers were very shallow but wide things, almost floods that allowed rainwater to wash from largely barren solid ground to sea. Deposits left behind were preserved as sheets of coarse grains, some of which suggest these rivers were 1,000 or more times as wide as they were deep.

”There is probably nowhere on Earth where rivers form the way they did before vegetation,” Gibling says.
一篇植物的Roots改变River的超长,2个科学家研究一个什么理论,讲了一个什么C时代前后,sediment的变化,以前河道很宽,变深,真的非常长

But by the time of the Silurian-Devonian boundary, some 420 million years ago, the picture found in preserved sedimentary rock changes. The blankets of unconsolidated sediment found in earlier river deposits appear less frequently. It happens just as evidence of land vegetation with root systems also expands in the rock record.

In addition, more complex and diverse river remains emerge, including more traces of mud, probably due to the enhanced chemical weathering that plants assist; smaller-sized sand grains; and samples of organic remains. Significantly, shapes shift too.

Organized deposits become visible in the remains of highly sinuous, single-thread channels. Evidence of lateral accretion—the digging away of material at the outer bends of a river and the simultaneous deposition of material at the inner bends—is more abundant.

There is also variation that appears to be related to the local climate during the times that the rivers flowed. ”Before plants evolved, it didn’t matter if a river was in a polar region, a temperate region or an arid region, the rivers looked the same. Later you find differences,” says Davies, who devoted two and a half years to this project.

Edward Cotter, a geologist long on the faculty of Bucknell University, was among the people arguing 30 years ago that rivers went through a big transition during the same period that Gibling and Davies emphasize. He observed it in sedimentary rocks in the central Appalachian Mountains dating from 450 to 250 million years ago. But unlike Gibling and Davies, he had limited evidence with which to extrapolate globally from his observations.

”They had a much richer database. They have a much healthier under- standing of how rivers run. They went around to different parts of the world and looked with their own eyes,” says Cotter, whose research Gibling and Da- vies cite in their publications.

Using funding from the Canadian government, Davies and Gibling reviewed 144 published reports describing river sediment preserved in the rock record, dating from the Cambrian to the Devonian, to build their case. They Visited 34 spots themselves in North America and Europe. And they scrutinized experimental results.

One laboratory finding that impressed Gibling was achieved at St. Anthony Falls Laboratory at the University of Minnesota. Working in a tank, researchers there described how vegetation—in this case alfalfa sprouts that were allowed to germinate on banks—transformed a channel that flowed between multiple sandbars into one that self-organized into a single-thread channel.

”The strength of the roots of alfalfa was enough to completely change the whole pattern. That generated a meandering river with banks that migrate and are erosion resistant,” Gibling says.

Dov Corenblit, an associate professor at the University of Paris who describes himself as a biogeomorphologist, says Davies and Gibling have delivered more than just insight into the history of rivers. They have expanded evidence that the biotic and abiotic features of this planet influence one another.

Their findings ”may be considered significant progress in the comprehension of one of the most critical phases in the coupling between physical and biological processes on Earth,” Corenblit says.

The Dalhousie University geologists aren’t done. They want to explore whether any of the periodic mass extinctions experienced on Earth might have affected the shapes of rivers as well. They are scouring the literature for changes preserved from the end of the Permian, when a lot of plant life was wiped out.

”We’ll look to see if rivers reverted to the older form,” Davies says.




板凳
发表于 2018-11-2 15:47:30 | 只看该作者
一篇traditioanl manufacturing不能soly依赖variety of goods, quality什么的,然后比较了craftsmanship;讲了upstream downstream;最后说工人们也很懂技术,可以很好的讲解技术什么的

https://hbr.org/1989/07/the-service-factory

Mass production overtook customized craftsmanship because customers came to value standardized goods over higher priced, personalized goods. As a result, work grew increasingly compartmentalized through the division of labor. Craftsmanship (that is, manufacturing) became separated from downstream activities, like sales and postpurchase service, as well as from upstream activities, like new-product development and design. Gradually, manufacturing received more and more of its information and instructions through filters—divisions and departments that were separated, functionally and physically, from the production site. Not surprisingly, manufacturing managers complained that those who defined their work rarely understood it or cared enough about its details, problems, or technical possibilities.

For decades, companies muddled through. In recent years, as Japanese competition put pressure on manufacturing businesses everywhere, manufacturers have worked mightily and successfully to educate workers and break down some of the barriers between their upstream activities and the work of the factory. They have encouraged interfunctional communication between product designers and manufacturing engineers and between R&D and quality managers on the factory floor.



地板
发表于 2018-11-2 17:28:26 | 只看该作者
楼上两篇是接近的原文??
5#
发表于 2018-11-2 17:49:30 | 只看该作者
第一篇也太惨无人道了一点吧
6#
发表于 2018-11-2 19:19:30 | 只看该作者
谢谢小天使,明天考试,比心心
7#
发表于 2018-11-2 19:38:28 | 只看该作者
Irenesha 发表于 2018-11-2 19:19
谢谢小天使,明天考试,比心心

Mark一下!               
8#
发表于 2018-11-2 19:39:30 | 只看该作者

明天考试加油啊! 心态看起来好好
9#
发表于 2018-11-2 20:20:59 | 只看该作者
碰到第一篇这样的文章.....心态会不会崩。。。
10#
发表于 2018-11-2 21:50:09 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 19:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部