ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4542|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] 关于方案推理模式划分的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-3-31 16:57:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
先贴例题和Helr大神的解释~

PREP87:Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65.  The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live.  Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?

A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.
B. The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high.
C. City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country.
D. The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas.
E. On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the increase.

他的解释:判断推理模式:

前提: 政府现在多给65岁以上的老人提供多20%的养老金

结论:政府这么做的目的是为了刺激农村地区(老人住的地方)的消费。

由前提和结论的关系我们能看出比较像是前提中是方案,结论中是目标。这里我们可以横向对比一下本题和86题。同样都是一样的“方案”,在86题中的结论是老人们的经济可以better off,显然和“方案”之间的因果关系比较直接。而在本题中,结论是刺激农村地区(老人住的地方)的消费,和“方案”之间的关系不那么直接,所以可以认为是一个目标,故而本题可以判断为方案推理。

请注意,以上两道题目虽然内容差不多,甚至连答案都差不多,但实则还是有本质区别的。大家在判断的时候,一定到尽量保证判断准确,方可不失不必要的分数。

我的疑问是:
像这道题目中提到了方案,也在原文中说明了这个方案不可行,也就是达不到刺激农村地区经济的目标,但是推理模式还是被判断成为了方案。但是在Helr笔记里面说到,如果方案在原文中已经被论证过了可行性,那么推理模式就一定不会是方案了。所谓,被论证过可行性是不是要求一定是可行的?像这道题目中一样,方案不可行的还是可以继续被论证也就是被划分为方案推理?
和这道题目很相似还有PREP86,两题内容相似但是推理模式,86被划分为了因果,但是很奇怪的是,86题同样也是方案被论证过了不可行。所以。。求NN解答我对于方案和因果的纠结,还有方案的划分。。



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
11#
发表于 2014-7-1 20:23:15 | 只看该作者
看了。最近学习的BAT和大D的经验贴,又再重新复习CR。谈谈我的感受:
First——根本没必要去纠结是不是方案推理。把题干的premise和conclusion找到就可以做题了
提高养老金→ 刺激rural经济失败
找这个问题的解释,只有两种思路:
养老金的目的是为了增加老人们的购买力,他们消费了,才会刺激经济——结果现在没成功
1 要么就是老人们没有增加消费,自然失败
2 要么就是老人们消费了,但是有别的什么事件导致rural的经济恶化程度超过了老人们的消费量,自然表现的结果还是失败

现在看CR,基本上题目就两种思路,正推和反推,然后木有了。。。
囧  我还在二战复习备考,大家探讨哈!
10#
发表于 2014-4-9 16:04:59 | 只看该作者
DDDDDDDDDD!!
9#
发表于 2014-4-7 15:20:32 | 只看该作者
顶起~~~~~~~有人看见了吗/
8#
发表于 2014-4-3 15:41:16 | 只看该作者
小蘑菇开始打怪 发表于 2014-4-3 15:17
就我俩呜呜呜。。。

我觉得这个问题应该由helr来回答啊
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-3 15:17:37 | 只看该作者
奔奔宝贝 发表于 2014-4-3 14:57
大家快看一眼啊,多好的问题呀

就我俩呜呜呜。。。
6#
发表于 2014-4-3 14:57:19 | 只看该作者
大家快看一眼啊,多好的问题呀
5#
发表于 2014-4-2 19:19:56 | 只看该作者
来顶顶,谁来回答我们的问题呀
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2014-4-1 09:40:13 | 只看该作者
哈哈那我自己也来顶一下吧~~
板凳
发表于 2014-4-1 08:45:58 | 只看该作者
来顶一下咯~大神快出现哈
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部