ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1398|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep12 CR 59请教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-10-15 10:15:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Prep12 CR 59

Press Secretary: our critics claim that the president's recent highway  project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report wrtten by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the president's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretar's argument depends?

A. Calceling highway projects was not the only way fo the president to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the president's party.
C. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive then the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.


答案是B。我没懂为什么。我觉得B明明就是削弱啊。肯请NN解释~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
6#
发表于 2013-12-16 08:35:45 | 只看该作者
yiyyy 发表于 2013-12-15 04:09
谢谢!
是不是assumption的题都可以用取非的思想做?

基本思路是这样的,而且大多数都可以!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-15 04:09:12 | 只看该作者
薄荷0816 发表于 2013-11-16 17:20
现在回复是不是太晚了……
assumption取非之后如果削弱就是对的,B取非之后是说那些浪费钱的项目大多是cont ...

谢谢!
是不是assumption的题都可以用取非的思想做?
地板
发表于 2013-11-16 17:20:59 | 只看该作者
现在回复是不是太晚了……
assumption取非之后如果削弱就是对的,B取非之后是说那些浪费钱的项目大多是controlled by the president's party。但是题目中说 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts(opposition parties)。这不就削弱了结论不是为了政治目的而是因为sound budgetary policy。因为要是真的是为了sound budgetary policy,对于取非后的B选项就应该大多部分被取消的是controlled by the president's party。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-17 05:29:00 | 只看该作者
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-16 01:29:49 | 只看该作者
没人搭理
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-4 18:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部