The reading passage examines a recent professionally ( adj+adv 的搭配语法错误比较明显呐^^感觉如果想要表达“最近的专业研究”可以说recently professional research之类的...虽然我感觉这样说也不太地道) portrait of a teenage girl which owned by a member of the Jane Austen's families, and asserts that the teenage girl in portrait is Jane Austen herself. However, the professor in lecture thinks (the professor's opinion比较地道而且也把语法错误改正了~) contradicts to the reading state (reading's statement) and (因为前面主语改成了opinion,所以这里加上一个he吧)supports his idea in three specific points.
Firstly, the lecture points out that even through the use of portrait as an illustration in an edition of Austen's letters was get (改成got或者用现在完成时) the approval of Austen's family, as the passage said, the case was happened (sth happen不需要被动哦~) 70 years after Austen's death. Her family might didn't (最好不用缩写啦~ 而且两个助动词哦。。下次要小心) see Austen with their own eyes ( 亲眼看见,其实就说 see sb on their own或直接 see sb themselves), which means the teenage girl in the portrait, could be mistake ( 这个是词典翻译出来的吗?^^。。最好不要这样用啦,换词如果一时想不出来,用原文的说法也可以的~换词是加分,语法错误可是扣分哦~) for Jane Austen.
Secondly, the passage indicates that(宾语从句的引导词不可以省略哦,特别是书面的时候) the face of the girl in portrait resembles Austen in the only accepted(这个有点看不懂了。。) image by her sister. But the lecture insists that there are many girls in Austen's family have these facial features (这个换词抽象得很好~), and the girl in portrait could be MG, one of Austen's distant kin.
(portrait 是可数名词,不能单数单独出现哦,要加上冠词~多打几个the字数还会多一点^^...)
Finally, contrary to the statement in the(加一些定冠词不会有错的~) reading that the image was painted by Ozias Humphrey. The professor contends that a stamp on the portrait reveals the painter actually is WL, and, base on the fact that Jane Austen has already been old in WL's active period. Thus, the girl in the painting seems impossible to be Austen herself.