3.7放几条狗

cxp6334228

考的没有很好，总之要重考，就不留分了；

1. 作文是黄金80题里 那个frozen food prosessor;
2.IR：第一个是学生enrollment的数量和每个人的费用什么的；然后 悲催的有两个大篇muti-resource，一个是关于奥运会排名，4个人对排名看法不一样，有说算奖牌总数，有说只算金牌，有说要加入国家population来算，有说金银铜加权，然后给了6个国家的按不同算法的表，还给了个某年的；还有篇想不起来了..；
3.数学，数学都是很简单很简单；有道水池里本来有75%的水，丢了个cube进去，问水位变化，1.给出水池的体积 2. cube的边长；
4. 阅读： 有篇好像是GWD 里出现过的， 美国关于apple 的政策，组织之类的，很长； 有篇是JJ里已有的关于某地什么遗留不是天文..是水相关的； 有篇是说德国公司在亚洲要分析那些international business performance, 过去用的public profit，是不对的，第二段写应该用share；

茶底世界

多谢

AngieZZZ

作文已经收到了，谢谢！！

Avapan

为啥木有逻辑狗狗~~~为啥这个月大家都不放逻辑狗狗。。。桑心了。。。

蓝柏

Between 1890 and 1930, the U.S.
apple industry underwent a profound transformation. At the beginning of the period, apples were produced in a scattering of orchards through the Midwest and East, near consumers; commercial apples were sold in face to face transactions. At the end of the period, apples were grown commercially in a handful of orchards in the Midwest, the East, and, most importantly, in the Pacific states, and shipped to distant consumers. Commercial apple transactions became anonymous, taking place between buyers and sellers separated by long distances. By 1930, apple sales relied on federally legislated marketing institutions. Quality was specified by federal grading standard, and third party federal inspection services were available to verify quality prior to shipment or after delivery. Standard business practices were dictated by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, which clearly specified when buyers or seller could change contract terms, and the procedures they were required to follow when altering contracts.
An alternative interpretation is that government involvement in apple marketing was a response to contract-enforcement problems arising as a result of the emergence of the national apple industry. Selling a perishable commodity over long distances was inherently problematic. First, quality declined naturally during the transcontinental delivery. Second, both farmers and the railroad, through their actions during packing and shipment, could accelerate this natural deterioration. Together, these two complications made it possible for sellers to claim to have shipped high quality fruit and for buyers to claim that delivered quality was low regardless of actual quality. Verification of these claims was impossible. The inability to detect whether reports of low delivered quality resulted from a random act of nature, inattention, or fraud left room for rent-seeking activity and opportunistic behavior.

Although the desire to avoid the negative consequences of a bad reputation encourages sellers and buyers to behave honestly, it may be impossible to develop a reputation when there are many buyers and sellers in the market. In such cases, when informal institutions become difficult to sustain, government or industry institutions may emerge. Quality certification and industry-defined minimum-quality standards are both effective methods for transmitting quality information from sellers to buyers. (Contract Evolution and institutional Innovation: Marketing Pacific-Grown Apples from 1890 to 1930)

-- by 会员 蓝柏 (2013/3/9 12:15:07)

就是这个... 这不是GWD 里的阅读么？ 反正觉得很熟悉....我三年前考过GMAT...这次考 没有看那么多 所以不记得了是不是GWD里的了

-- by 会员 cxp6334228 (2013/3/10 2:34:54)

原文和这个一毛一样的吗？

晨依Jacqueline

谢谢确认！(*￣▽￣)y

cxp6334228

就是这个  第一个图更像 我当时用的折线最高乘以相应的柱图 ，和柱图最高乘以相应的折线点 ， 结果俩一样的结果.....我就慌了....后来想想 GMAT 出题应该不会两个相近的一个是答案 应该选柱状和折线都中间的试试看吧。。。。

楼主麻烦帮晨依确认考古吧~~~thx！！！！

-- by 会员 晨依Jacqueline (2013/3/9 17:40:33)

cxp6334228

Between 1890 and 1930, the U.S.
apple industry underwent a profound transformation. At the beginning of the period, apples were produced in a scattering of orchards through the Midwest and East, near consumers; commercial apples were sold in face to face transactions. At the end of the period, apples were grown commercially in a handful of orchards in the Midwest, the East, and, most importantly, in the Pacific states, and shipped to distant consumers. Commercial apple transactions became anonymous, taking place between buyers and sellers separated by long distances. By 1930, apple sales relied on federally legislated marketing institutions. Quality was specified by federal grading standard, and third party federal inspection services were available to verify quality prior to shipment or after delivery. Standard business practices were dictated by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, which clearly specified when buyers or seller could change contract terms, and the procedures they were required to follow when altering contracts.
An alternative interpretation is that government involvement in apple marketing was a response to contract-enforcement problems arising as a result of the emergence of the national apple industry. Selling a perishable commodity over long distances was inherently problematic. First, quality declined naturally during the transcontinental delivery. Second, both farmers and the railroad, through their actions during packing and shipment, could accelerate this natural deterioration. Together, these two complications made it possible for sellers to claim to have shipped high quality fruit and for buyers to claim that delivered quality was low regardless of actual quality. Verification of these claims was impossible. The inability to detect whether reports of low delivered quality resulted from a random act of nature, inattention, or fraud left room for rent-seeking activity and opportunistic behavior.

Although the desire to avoid the negative consequences of a bad reputation encourages sellers and buyers to behave honestly, it may be impossible to develop a reputation when there are many buyers and sellers in the market. In such cases, when informal institutions become difficult to sustain, government or industry institutions may emerge. Quality certification and industry-defined minimum-quality standards are both effective methods for transmitting quality information from sellers to buyers. (Contract Evolution and institutional Innovation: Marketing Pacific-Grown Apples from 1890 to 1930)

-- by 会员 蓝柏 (2013/3/9 12:15:07)

就是这个... 这不是GWD 里的阅读么？ 反正觉得很熟悉....我三年前考过GMAT...这次考 没有看那么多 所以不记得了是不是GWD里的了

晨依Jacqueline

楼主麻烦帮晨依确认考古吧~~~thx！！！！

371989728

谢谢！！