- UID
- 745166
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-4-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
31 January IndependentWriting: Do you agree ordisagree with the following statement? Your job hasgreater happiness than your social work. Perhaps, no issue is as significant to one's life ashis job. Despite various responses, people may have the problem whether yourjob has greater happiness than your social work. Nowadays, there is a solid bodyof the opinion that social work can only make a person more tired and unhappy,since everyone has to move fast in order to catch the majority without time todo other things. However, some people may argue that one's life can be morecolorful by participating into social works, which will definitely make themhappier. I, given the chance, prefer to advocate that one's job has greaterhappiness than one's social work. To begin with, social works will be able to leave onea relaxed and happy mind from monotonous and mundane work. We should get a lifeoutside work. It is vital to escape from the swamp that we are forever bidingour time in our job we are tired with. By participating into a social work,which one does not need to worry about the quality and your efficiencyparticularly, one will gain a relaxed mind and become more tolerated of thestressfully ever-changing world. Even though happy seems one's job, one will bedrawn to chase the utilitarian purpose and evaluated by a criterion based on theprofits one makes inevitably in thismodern world that is extremely pragmatic. Thus, one will gain a more relaxedand happier mind than one's job. Furthermore, taking part in social works can encourageus to see everything in a positive way and develop a habit to devote to thesociety, which will provide us more happiness. There is no better illustrationthan the example that one devotes his spare time to the voluntary works, like awork in an elementary school without good facilities and environment in a poorarea. One will experience the poverty he never know and try his best to cherishthe valuable time he have. Facing all kinds of tough difficulties in voluntarywork one cannot get from your job, one will be forced to walk towardsformidable challenges positively in the future. One sacrifices his invaluabletime for the voluntary work, which has little utilitarian, however, not onlydoes he learn to see everything in a positive way but also he will realize themeaning of the world. Without hesitation, all of these will be attached to thehappiness of a person. Finally, the expansion of the circle of one's friendsgetting from social work is another critical factor that can provide morehappiness than our jobs. Joining in social works suggest that one will stepinto a totally distinctive world from one's monotonous work. People assemblefrom a large scale of different kind of careers in social works. One can makefriends with others having the same interest and share his unique experiencewith each other. What they go through in social work colors one's life. Nevertheless,in one's office, what one views every day is always the same scene, the samepeople, the same work place. Although one is keen on his job, it is a littlemore monotonous than social work. In summary,considering all the perspectives listed above, we can safely conclude thatone's job has greater happiness than one's social work. IntegratedWriting: TPO8 The lecturer claims that virtually most parts of thememoir Chevalier has done are accurate, which is not in agreement with thereading passage that Chevalier distorted and invented many events in thememoir. First, the lecturer rebuts that borrowing money fromothers means Chevalier was very poor in Switzerland mentioned in passage. Thisis because he had not converted his assets to cash when he longed for the cashthat could be used for parties and gambling, even though rich seeded Chevalier.This is in marked contrast to the argument in the passage. Moreover, the professor claims that the conversationbetween Chevalier and Voltaire is accurate enough. Then he supports this pointwith the fact that Chevalier jotted down after each conversation with Voltaireand consulted notes when composing, which suggest he had not invented anyevents of the conversation with Voltaire. Clearly, the professor's argumentdisproves its counterpart in the reading passage that the conversation betweenChevalier and Voltaire is not accurate. Finally, regarding Chevalier's escape from prison, thespeaker does not contend that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him,which is proved by the passage. He proves that this claim is indefensible bypointing out that there were some prisoners even having more powerful friends.They could not bribe jailers to free them. Also, the fact that people repairedthe ceiling of the prison Chevalier lived means the possibility he escaped fromceiling, which is in direct contradiction with the passage. |
|